A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Physiological Assessment of ECCOR on the Work of Breathing in Exacerbations of COPD. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Rationale: The impact of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCOR) on work of breathing and aeration in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) is poorly understood.

Objectives: The study explores the impact of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and ECCOR on respiratory drive, effort and distribution of ventilation in AECOPD.

Methods: Patients enrolled in a randomised controlled study of the addition of ECCOR to NIV compared with NIV underwent oesophageal pressure measurement, electrical impedance tomography and parasternal electromyography.

Measurements And Main Results: 18 patients were enrolled, nine in each arm. Of these, eight in the NIV arm and seven in the ECCOR arm underwent physiological assessment. Patients randomised to ECCOR, had a period of NIV combined with ECCOR and, after removal of NIV, a period of ECCOR alone. The removal of NIV whilst remaining on ECCOR resulted in a respiratory acidosis (pH 7.34 (7.31-7.34) vs. 7.31 (7.31-7.34),  < 0.0001), increased work of breathing (7.43 (6.08-10.19) vs. 11.1 (8.11-15.15) J/min,  < 0.0001) and increased neural drive (884.4 (684.7-967.3) vs. 1321.1 (903.3-1575.3) AU,  = 0.0005). On day 1, the work of breathing was lower in the NIV than the ECCOR group (4.38 (2.76-7.27) vs. 8.03 (4.8-15.94) J/min,  < 0.0001), minute ventilation was higher (15.54 (13.14-18.48) vs. 12.24 (8.51-13.9) L/min,  < 0.0001) and neural drive was the same (1,163.8 (1,085.5-1,325.5) vs. 1,093.8 (885.7-1,258.7) AU,  = 0.5556).

Conclusions: The combination of NIV and ECCOR results in lower work of breathing and improved neuro-ventilatory coupling. NIV fully supports ventilation early whilst ECCOR improves neuro-ventilatory coupling and work of breathing over time.

Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov; NCT02086084; registered 1 December 2015; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02086084?cond=copd&term=ecco2r&rank=4.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15412555.2024.2436169DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

eccor
9
physiological assessment
8
eccor work
8
work breathing
8
eccor respiratory
8
patients enrolled
8
eccor removal
8
removal niv
8
niv
7
assessment eccor
4

Similar Publications