Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Following the publication of the above article, an interested reader drew to the Editor's attention that various of the histological structural images shown in Fig. 5 on p. 190 were strikingly similar to data that were featured in Fig. 1A of a previous paper by the same research group that appeared in the Journal . On re‑examining their original data, the authors confirmed that an error occurred during the paper submission/production process, and that Fig. 5 did not appear in the above article as the authors had intended. The correct version of Fig. 5, containing the data that the authors intended for inclusion in this article, is shown on the next page. Also shown is a corrected version of Table II corresponding to the replacement version of Fig. 5, containing data that are derived from an analysis of the data shown in this figure. Furthermore, the replacement of the images in Fig. 5, and the revisions of the data made in Table II, also dictate that the following changes are needed to be made in the main text of the paper (all associated with Results section on p. 191, '' subsection): The sentences in lines 9‑14 of this section should now read as following (changes from the original text are highlighted in ): 'Following Lop+EtRLP or Lop+Bisac treatments, the villus length increased by relative to the Lop+Vehicle‑treated group (Fig. 5 and Table II). Furthermore, the alterations in were similar to those in villus length, although crypt layer thickness only increased by relative to the (Fig. 5 and Table II)'. Note that the errors made during the assembly of Fig. 5 and Table II did not grossly affect the overall conclusions reported in the paper. All the authors agree with the publication of this corrigendum, and are grateful to the Editor of for allowing them the opportunity to publish this. They also apologize to the readership for any inconvenience caused. [International Journal of Molecular Medicine 43: 185‑198, 2019; DOI: 10.3892/ijmm.2018.3960].
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11637494 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2024.5462 | DOI Listing |