Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
The prevalence of gastric NEN is estimated worldwide at 8.9% of all gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (GEP-NEN) and only 0.3%-1% of all gastric neoplasms, but is rising in the last decades. The aim of this project was to map the epidemiology of gastric neuroendocrine neoplasm (gNEN) in Belgium. This is a population-wide retrospective cohort study over 10 years (2010-2019), based on data from the Belgian Cancer Registry. A total of 641 patients were included; 605 patients with gNEN and 36 with MiNEN. The AAIR of gNEN was 0.67 per 100,000 person-years, increasing over the years and with a slight female predominance (55.4%). Neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) accounted for 15.7% (N = 95), with an AAIR of 0.11 per 100,000 person-years. The other 510 patients were diagnosed with gNET: G1 NET was most prevalent (54.3%) followed by G2 (32.5%) and G3 NET (3.5%). Concerning the clinical classification (type) of gNET, a diagnosis of type 1 tumors was presumed in 67.6%, type 3 tumors in 17.1% and type 2 tumors in 0.6% of patients. In only 3.8% of patients, the clinical classification was explicitly stated in the pathology report. Stage IV tumors were diagnosed in 13.4% (N = 81). A favorable evolution in pathology reporting is seen. Some variables-for example, clinical classification of gNET-were heavily underreported, stressing the importance of registries integrating clinical and pathological information.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jne.13473 | DOI Listing |