Category Ranking
98%
Total Visits
921
Avg Visit Duration
2 minutes
Citations
20
Article Abstract
Background: Patient center care (PCC) plays a crucial role in achieving the organizational and patient outcomes. Literature suggests that PCC enhance patient's adherence to treatment, lower the cost of health care organization. This study aimed explore the higher and middle managers' perceptions of patient-centered care (PCC) in an oncology setting, identify the PCC implementation challenges in the oncology setting, and understand the role of managers in facilitating PCC within the oncology context.
Methods: Sampling involved the use of the purposive sampling technique on 17 middle managers and 6 upper managers who had been working in an oncology setting. The six-step thematic analysis method was used for data analysis.
Results: The interviews identified six main themes and seventeen subthemes: "comprehensive care, partnership, and informed decision-making", "infrastructure and support systems", "leadership influence on patient-centered care", "cultural and operational barriers", "perceived outcomes", and "strategies to enhance PCC in oncology". The subthemes of comprehensive care included fostering partnerships and enabling informed decisions. The infrastructure and support systems encompassed educational empowerment and service integration. Leadership influence highlighted the role of elevating awareness, providing organizational support, and promoting comprehensive care. The cultural and operational barriers addressed the challenges faced in implementation. The perceived outcomes focused on the results of patient-centered care, while strategies to enhance PCC in oncology provided actionable insights for improvement. This provides a comprehensive understanding of the perceptions of middle and higher managers on patient-centered care (PCC) in oncology settings. It identifies key challenges in PCC implementation, highlights the critical role of managers in facilitating PCC, and offers actionable strategies for enhancing PCC.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587424 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14040244 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Comparative Effectiveness of TAVI Platforms and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv
September 2025
Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Keele University, United Kingdom (M.A.M., R.B.).
Background: Evidence informing clinical guidelines assumes that all transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) devices have similar effectiveness, in other words, displaying a class effect across TAVI valves. We aimed to assess the comparative effectiveness of different TAVI platforms relative to other TAVI counterparts or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).
Methods: MEDLINE/Embase/CENTRAL were searched from inception until April 2025, for randomized controlled trials comparing outcomes with different commercially available TAVI devices relative to other TAVI counterparts or SAVR.
Improving Patient Engagement in Phase 2 Clinical Trials With a Trial-Specific Patient Decision Aid: Development and Usability Study.
J Med Internet Res
September 2025
Department of Precision Medicine, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, Maastricht, 6229 ER, The Netherlands, 31 433883549.
Background: Making informed decisions about clinical trial participation can be overwhelming for patients due to the complexity of trial information, potential risks and benefits, and the emotional burden of a recent diagnosis. Patient decision aids (PDAs) simplify this process by providing clear information on treatment options, empowering patients to actively participate in shared decision-making with their doctors. While PDAs have shown promise in various health care contexts, their use in clinical trials, particularly in the form of trial-specific patient decision aids (tPDAs), remains underused.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFReimagining Outcomes: A Perspective Review of Advances in Remote Monitoring Technologies in Post-Arthroplasty Patient Care.
J Orthop Res
September 2025
Department of Kinesiology, College of Health Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island, USA.
Arthroplasty surgery is a common and successful end-stage intervention for advanced osteoarthritis. Yet, postoperative outcomes vary significantly among patients, leading to a plethora of measures and associated measurement approaches to monitor patient outcomes. Traditional approaches rely heavily on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), which are widely used, but often lack sensitivity to detect function changes (e.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBariatric surgery is an effective treatment for morbid obesity, but patient outcomes differ greatly because of a variety of phenotypes, comorbidities, and postoperative adherence. In bariatric care, artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are becoming revolutionary tools because traditional predictive models based on BMI and demographic variables are unable to account for these complexities. To put it simply, AI is a branch of computer science that enables machines to perform tasks that typically require human intelligence.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPhysician-led versus questionnaire-based psychosocial screening in adults with high-grade glioma: a cluster-randomized controlled trial (GLIOPT).
J Neurooncol
September 2025
Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Purpose: Patients diagnosed with high-grade gliomas (HGG) often experience substantial psychosocial dis-tress. However, due to neurological and neurocognitive deficits its assessment remains challenging, and needs remain unmet. We compared a novel face-to-face assessment during doctor-patient conversations with questionnaire-based screening.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF