Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the integration of dual-energy CT (DECT) into CT-guided bone biopsy procedures, comparing it with conventional CT techniques. The focus was on technical aspects, accuracy and radiation dose exposure.
Materials And Methods: A total of 51 bone biopsies were conducted, with 36 using conventional CT and 15 utilizing DECT. Patient data, lesion characteristics and biopsy techniques were analyzed. Statistical analyses, including Fisher's exact test and independent samples t-test, were performed to compare accuracy and radiation doses between the two methods.
Results: DECT-guided biopsies demonstrated a significantly higher accuracy (93.33%) compared to conventional CT biopsies (86.11%). The radiation dose exposure for DECT was comparable to conventional CT. DECT's ability to differentiate tissues, especially in bone marrow edema detection, led to higher precision.
Conclusion: Integrating DECT into CT-guided bone biopsies enhances tissue differentiation and accuracy without significantly increasing radiation exposure. This advancement holds promise for improving musculoskeletal interventional radiology, leading to more precise diagnoses, informed treatment decisions and improved patient outcomes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-024-01935-3 | DOI Listing |