A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Effects of Positive Expiratory Pressure on Gas Exchange, Atelectasis, Hemodynamics, and Dyspnea in Spontaneously Breathing Critically Ill Subjects. | LitMetric

Effects of Positive Expiratory Pressure on Gas Exchange, Atelectasis, Hemodynamics, and Dyspnea in Spontaneously Breathing Critically Ill Subjects.

Respir Care

Drs. Servetti, Ball, Robba, Patroniti, and Battaglini are affiliated with Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche e Diagnostiche Integrate (DISC), Università degli Studi di Genova, Genova, Italy; and Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.

Published: March 2025


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

The EzPAP Positive Airway Pressure System (EzPAP) is a noninvasive positive expiratory pressure (PEP) device designed to promote lung expansion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of PEP on gas exchange. Secondary objectives included assessing the early effects of PEP on radiological atelectasis score (RAS), hemodynamics, and dyspnea. These outcomes were compared between spontaneously breathing subjects with and without tracheostomy. This observational single-center study was conducted at a university hospital. Inclusion criteria were spontaneously breathing adult subjects with RAS ≥ 2 and a worsened P/F. Exclusion criteria included life-threatening conditions, intracranial hypertension, hemodynamic instability, and pneumothorax. Gas-exchange, hemodynamic parameters, and dyspnea measured with the Respiratory Distress Observation Scale (RDOS) were assessed at 3 time points: T0 (before PEP), T1 (immediately after PEP), and T2 (2 h after PEP). RAS was assessed at T0 and 1-week post treatment (T3). Of 213 patients assessed for eligibility, 186 were excluded for various reasons, leaving 27 subjects (19 without and 8 with tracheostomy) enrolled in the study. The median [interquartile range] age was 65 [58-74] y, with 66.7% being male. In the overall sample and in subjects without tracheostomy, P/F did not differ significantly between T1 and T0 ( = .52 and = .54, respectively) or between T2 and T0 ( = .47 and = .85, respectively). In subjects with tracheostomy, P/Fwas higher at T1 compared to T0 ( = .039) but not between T2 and T0 ( = .58). Arterial P and hemodynamic parameters remained unchanged in the overall cohort. The RAS improved within 1 week of treatment in the overall cohort (T3 vs T0,  < .001) and in subjects without tracheostomy (T3 vs T0, = .001). However, PEP therapy did not improve RDOS. In critically ill, spontaneously breathing subjects, PEP therapy significantly improved RAS without affecting hemodynamic stability or respiratory symptoms.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.4187/respcare.12000DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

subjects tracheostomy
16
spontaneously breathing
12
positive expiratory
8
expiratory pressure
8
gas exchange
8
hemodynamics dyspnea
8
effects pep
8
hemodynamic parameters
8
pep pep
8
subjects
6

Similar Publications