A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Which glaucoma patients should be monitored at home and exploration of clinician perceptions on home monitoring? a survey of glaucoma specialists in the UK. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objectives: To identify suitable patients for glaucoma home monitoring and explore clinicians' perceptions of the possible benefits and risks of home monitoring within the National Health Service.

Design: An online survey composed of open-ended and closed-ended questions.

Setting: Secondary care.

Participants: Glaucoma specialists registered with the UK and Eire Glaucoma Society.

Outcome Measures: Agreement with clinical scenarios.

Results: The estimated response rate was 68% (n=49). Of 49 participants, 92% (n=45) were consultant ophthalmologists and 71% (n=35) had over 10-year experience. There was a poor agreement regarding an ideal glaucoma patient for home monitoring, with only one scenario achieving over 60% agreement. Most participants believed that home monitoring would be most suitable for low-risk scenarios, rather than high-risk, due to fear of missing progression. In relation to acceptability, key facilitators included the potential to increase healthcare capacity and promote patient safety. However, low clinician trust in equipment reliability and fear of patient harm were reported as concerns.

Conclusions: There was no clear consensus on which patients would benefit most from glaucoma home monitoring. While many clinicians believe home monitoring may enhance healthcare, there were also many concerns about the technologies themselves. Further work to address clinician concerns is warranted.

Research Registry Registration Number: 6213.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574396PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080873DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

glaucoma specialists
8
glaucoma monitoring
8
glaucoma
7
monitoring
6
glaucoma patients
4
patients monitored
4
monitored exploration
4
exploration clinician
4
clinician perceptions
4
perceptions monitoring?
4

Similar Publications