A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Impact of the time interval between biopsy and radical prostatectomy on functional outcomes. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: The aim of our study was to investigate the impact of the time interval between prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy (RP) on postoperative urinary continence (UC)/erectile function (EF). From a clinical point of view, an interval of several weeks seems to facilitate surgical preparation.

Materials And Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent RP for localized prostate cancer (PCa) in a tertiary care center between 2011 and 2020. We evaluated the influence of the following variables on UC and EF 1 year after RP: time from biopsy to RP, age, BMI, pathological T-stage, EF and intraoperative nerve sparing (unilateral vs. bilateral). For this purpose, we performed linear regression analyses as well as manual grouping and cluster analyses to identify possible temporal cutoff ranges. The EPIC-26 and the IIEF questionnaires were used for the assessment of UC and EF.

Results: We identified 6202 consecutive patients who underwent RP. Neither manual grouping nor cluster analyses showed a significant difference in continence or potency after RP. According to linear regression models, only age was an independent predictor of incontinence (95%-CI 0.006-0.01), and EF before RP (95%-CI 0.22-0.26), age (95%-CI - 0.68 to - 0.5), BMI (95%-CI - 0.66 to - 0.29) and bilateral NS (95%-CI 5.5-2.1) had significant impacts on postoperative EF (all p < 0.001).

Conclusion: In the selected patient population, the time interval between prostate biopsy and RP did not seem to have an effect on postoperative functional outcomes (UC and EF).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569003PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05324-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

impact time
8
time interval
8
biopsy radical
8
radical prostatectomy
8
patients underwent
8
linear regression
8
manual grouping
8
grouping cluster
8
cluster analyses
8
95%-ci
5

Similar Publications