Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Epigenetic age quantifies biological age using DNA methylation information and is a potential pathway by which physical activity benefits general health. We aimed to assess the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between physical activity and epigenetic age in middle-aged and older Australians. Blood DNA methylation data for 6208 participants (40% female) in the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study (MCCS) were available at baseline (1990-1994, mean age, 59 years) and, of those, for 1009 at follow-up (2003-2007, mean age, 69 years). Physical activity measurements (weighted scores at baseline and follow-up and total MET hours per week at follow-up) were calculated from self-reported questionnaire data. Five blood methylation-based markers of ageing (PCGrimAge, PCPhenoAge, bAge, DNAmFitAge, and DunedinPACE) and four fitness-related markers (DNAmGaitspeed, DNAmGripmax, DNAmVO2max, and DNAmFEV1) were calculated and adjusted for age. Linear regression was used to examine the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between physical activity and epigenetic age. Effect modification by age, sex, and BMI was assessed. At baseline, a standard deviation (SD) increment in physical activity was associated with 0.03-SD (DNAmFitAge, 95%CI = 0.01, 0.06, P = 0.02) to 0.07-SD (bAge, 95%CI = 0.04, 0.09, P = 2 × 10) lower epigenetic age. These associations were attenuated after adjustment for other lifestyle variables. Only weak evidence was found for the longitudinal association (N = 1009) of changes in physical activity and epigenetic age (e.g. DNAmFitAge: adjusted β = - 0.04, 95%CI = - 0.08, 0.01). The associations were not modified by age, sex, or BMI. In middle-aged and older Australians, higher levels of self-reported physical activity were associated with slightly lower epigenetic age.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11979085 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11357-024-01408-5 | DOI Listing |