98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Racial disparities in prostate cancer treatment and survival in the U.S. have been attributed to differences in access to care and medical insurance. We aimed to compare treatment and survival of advanced prostate cancers between White and Black men in the equal access Military Health System (MHS).
Methods: We accessed the MilCanEpi database to study a cohort of non-Hispanic White and Black men diagnosed with stage III or IV prostate cancer between 1998 and 2014 in the MHS. The racial groups were compared in receiving curative treatment of radical prostatectomy (RP) only, RP with (neo)adjuvant radiation or hormone therapy, radiation only, or combination radiation and hormone therapy; and overall survival using multivariable regression models.
Results: The study included 1476 White and 531 Black men. Overall, there was no racial difference in receiving any curative treatment (AOR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.67, 1.08 for Black vs. White). By treatment type, Black men were statistically as likely to receive RP only (AOR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.67, 1.14), radiation only (AOR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.49, 1.34), or combination radiation and hormone therapy (AOR = 1.12, 95% CI = 0.71, 1.78) but statistically less likely to receive RP with (neo)adjuvant treatment (AOR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.37, 0.86) relative to no curative treatment compared to White men. The difference in RP with (neo)adjuvant treatment was also statistically significant among patients with stage III tumors, but not stage IV. Survival was similar overall (AHR = 1.12, 95% CI = 0.88, 1.42 for Black vs. White) and when evaluated by tumor stage.
Conclusions: In the MHS, the overall likelihood to receive any treatment for advanced prostate cancers and survival was similar between races, which might result from universal health care. Racial differences in receipt of RP with (neo)adjuvant treatment, especially for patients with stage III prostate cancer, may be related to factors other than access to care and warrants further research.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40615-024-02217-4 | DOI Listing |
Adv Radiat Oncol
October 2025
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Purpose: To evaluate the impact of an optimized online adaptive radiation therapy workflow on physician involvement.
Methods And Materials: Data from a prospective phase 2 trial involving 34 prostate cancer patients treated with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based online adaptive radiation therapy (62 Gy in 20 fractions) were analyzed. Manual interventions were required for 2 steps in the workflow: radiation therapy technologist review and adjustment of automatically segmented organs, guiding target segmentation, so-called "influencer," while physicians reviewed and refined the targets.
Biochem Biophys Rep
June 2025
The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Background: SLC16A3, a highly expressed H + -coupled symporter, facilitates lactate transport via monocarboxylate transporters (MCTs), contributing to acidosis. Although SLC16A3 has been implicated in tumor development, its role in tumor immunity remains unclear.
Methods: A pan-cancer analysis was conducted using datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas, Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia, and Genotype-Tissue Expression projects.
BJUI Compass
September 2025
Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto University Kyoto Kyoto Japan.
Objectives: To develop a novel risk score (RS) model to predict the probability of progression to castration-resistant prostate cancer (PCa) (CRPC) after intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for patients with high- and very high-risk PCa according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk classification, since accurate prediction of the clinical outcome of definitive radiation therapy for patients with high- and very high-risk PCa remains challenging due to its heterogeneity.
Materials And Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 600 patients with high- and very high-risk PCa treated with IMRT at our institution. They were randomly divided into discovery (n = 300) and validation (n = 300) cohorts.
Med Phys
September 2025
Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Background: Dose-driven continuous scanning (DDCS) enhances the efficiency and precision of proton pencil beam delivery by reducing beam pauses inherent in discrete spot scanning (DSS). However, current DDCS optimization studies using traveling salesman problem (TSP) formulations often rely on fixed beam intensity and computationally expensive interpolation for move spot generation, limiting efficiency and methodological robustness.
Purpose: This study introduces a Break Spot-Guided (BSG) method, combined with two acceleration strategies-dose rate skipping and bounding-to optimize beam intensity while minimizing beam delivery time (BDT).
Int J Cancer
September 2025
Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
A family history of prostate cancer in first-degree relatives is an established risk factor for prostate cancer, but the specific associations between prostate cancer characteristics in fathers and the risk of high-risk prostate cancer in their sons remain unclear. We identified men in Prostate Cancer data Base Sweden whose fathers had been diagnosed with prostate cancer in 1998-2005. We compared the observed number of prostate cancer diagnoses in these men with the expected number in the Swedish male population, estimating standardized incidence ratios (SIR).
View Article and Find Full Text PDF