Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Limited palmar fasciectomy (LPF) and collagenase injection (CI) are the most common procedures to manage symptoms of Dupuytren's Disease. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to directly compare patient outcomes 12 months following CI and LPF. Twenty-two patients with Dupuytren's Disease were randomized to either LPF or CI. The primary outcome was health state measured by the Michigan Hand Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes were health status (The Health Utility Index-3), function (The Unité Rhumatologique des Affections de la Main and The Southampton Dupuytren's Scoring Scheme), and range of motion (ROM) of treated digits. Measurements were collected at baseline and 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-procedure. Thirteen patients were randomized to the LPF and eight patients to the CI group. Most patients (85.7%) were male; the average age of the sample was 65.3 years. No statistically significant difference in the MHQ (mean difference [MD]: -12.4 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -30.0, 5.2)), SDSS (.9 (-4.0, 5.8)), URAM (-.9 (-14.4, 12.6)) or HUI-3 (-.04, -.2, .2)) was found between groups 12-months post-operatively. There was no statistically significant difference in 12-month loss of extension between groups at the MCP (-16.9 (-35.4, 1.7) or PIP (-2.9 (-22.9, 17.1) joints. Three CI patients and 1 LPF patient developed a contracture in the same digit requiring surgery. Results should be interpreted with caution given the small sample size. Available data suggests both techniques are reasonable for managing Dupuytren's Disease. Considerations for future RCTs are provided.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11489938PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/22925503231161066DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dupuytren's disease
12
randomized controlled
8
controlled trial
8
collagenase injection
8
palmar fasciectomy
8
disease randomized
8
randomized lpf
8
statistically difference
8
dupuytren's
5
lpf
5

Similar Publications

Management of Dupuytren disease of the little finger.

J Orthop Surg Res

August 2025

Orthopaedics and Traumatology Unit, Department of Emergency and Acceptance, Hospital San Camillo-Forlanini, Rome, 05152, Italy.

Background: The surgical management of Dupuytren disease (DD) is associated with a high rate of complications. Recurrences are relatively common and may result in permanent disability, particularly when the little finger (LF) is involved. This study aims to provide both objective and subjective information, along with professionals' experiences.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To compare the cost-effectiveness of collagenase injection (collagenase) and limited fasciectomy (LF) surgery in treating moderate Dupuytren's contracture (DC) in the UK over different time horizons.

Methods: An incremental cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted alongside a multicentre, pragmatic, parallel randomised controlled trial (DISC), to determine the short-term cost-effectiveness of collagenase compared to LF. A Markov decision analytic model was developed to assess long-term cost-effectiveness.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Comparing Treatment Approaches for Dupuytren Contracture: Percutaneous Needle Fasciotomy With and Without Corticosteroids.

J Am Acad Orthop Surg

July 2025

From the John Sealy School of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX (Pistone, Majeed, and Torres), and the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Univeristy of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX (Faillace).

Introduction: Percutaneous needle fasciotomy (PNF) is a standard treatment for Dupuytren contracture. In some instances, clinicians administer intraoperative corticosteroids (ICS) and/or postoperative corticosteroids (PCS) alongside PNF to improve outcomes. However, few studies have systematically investigated the efficacy of ICS and/or PCS as adjuvant therapies to PNF.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The health care sector is the fifth largest contributor to greenhouse emissions globally. Results of several studies have demonstrated that altering surgical practices from inpatient to outpatient service was associated with cost savings, reduction of medical waste and energy expenditure. The objective of this study was a comparison of costs and energy expenditure for hand surgeries performed in an operating theatre versus a ward procedure room.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF