A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

A Comparative Analysis of Clinical Symptoms and Modified Pouchitis Disease Activity Index Among Endoscopic Phenotypes of the J Pouch in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: The modified pouchitis disease activity index (mPDAI) based on clinical symptoms and endoscopic findings is used to diagnose pouchitis, but validated instruments to monitor pouchitis are still lacking. We recently established an endoscopic classification that described 7 endoscopic phenotypes with different outcomes. We assessed symptoms and compared mPDAIs among phenotypes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed pouchoscopies and classified them into 7 main phenotypes: normal ( = 25), afferent limb (AL) involvement ( = 4), inlet involvement ( = 14), diffuse ( = 7), focal inflammation of the pouch body ( = 25), cuffitis ( = 18), and pouch-related fistulas ( = 10) with a single phenotype were included. Complete-case analysis was conducted.

Results: One hundred and three IBD patients were included. The median mPDAI was 0 (IQR 0-1.0) in patients with a normal pouch. Among inflammatory phenotypes, the highest median mPDAI was 4.0 (IQR 2.25-4.75) in cuffitis, followed by 3.0 (IQR 2.5-4.0) in diffuse inflammation, 2.5 (IQR 1.25-4.0) in inlet involvement, 2.5 (IQR 2.0-3.5) in AL involvement, 2.0 (IQR 1.0-3.0) in focal inflammation, and 1.0 (IQR 0.25-2.0) in the fistula phenotype. Perianal symptoms were frequently observed in pouch-related fistulas (8/10, 80%) and cuffitis (13/15, 87%). Among patients with cuffitis, all had incomplete emptying (6/6, 100%).

Conclusions: We correlated the mPDAI with the endoscopic phenotypes and described the limited utility of symptoms in distinguishing between inflammatory phenotypes. Further studies are warranted to understand which symptoms should be monitored for each phenotype and whether mPDAI can be minimized after pouch normalization.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11438232PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/crocol/otae045DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

endoscopic phenotypes
12
clinical symptoms
8
modified pouchitis
8
pouchitis disease
8
disease activity
8
inflammatory bowel
8
bowel disease
8
inlet involvement
8
focal inflammation
8
pouch-related fistulas
8

Similar Publications