98%
921
2 minutes
20
Spinal stenosis is a prevalent degenerative spinal disease and one of the main causes of pain and dysfunction in older adults. Substantial evidence indicates a potentially relevant association between type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and spinal stenosis. However, the causality between these 2 disorders remains unclear. Therefore, we intended to elucidate this relationship using Mendelian Randomization (MR) analysis in this study. Based on genome-wide association study (GWAS) data on T2DM and spinal stenosis, we performed a bidirectional 2-sample MR analysis to evaluate the causality of T2DM and spinal stenosis. We assessed heterogeneity using Cochran's Q statistic and horizontal pleiotropy using the MR-Egger-intercept. "Leave-one-out" analysis was performed to determine the reliability of causal relationships. In addition, we conducted multivariate MR to clarify the direct influence of T2DM on spinal stenosis after accounting for the effect of body mass index (BMI) on spinal stenosis. Our results indicated that Individuals with T2DM had a heightened risk of spinal stenosis (odds ratio [OR]: 1.050; 95% CI: 1.004-1.098, P = .031). Moreover, no reverse causality existed between T2DM and spinal stenosis. The results of the sensitivity analysis suggest that causality is steady and robust. Multivariate MR results demonstrated that the causality of T2DM on spinal stenosis was not related to BMI (OR, 1.047; 95% CI: 1.003-1.093; P = .032). MR analyses demonstrated a possible positive causal relationship between T2DM and spinal stenosis and that this causality was unrelated to BMI.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11441963 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000039894 | DOI Listing |
Eur Spine J
September 2025
Department of Spine Surgery, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guangxi, China.
Purpose: This study aims to assess the outcomes of combining oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) with anterolateral screw fixation (ASF) and stress endplate augmentation (SEA) in comparison to OLIF combined with pedicle screw fixation (PSF) for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) in patients with osteoporosis (OP).
Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with DLSS who underwent OLIF in conjunction with either SEA and ASF (SEA-ASF group) or PSF (PSF group). Clinical outcomes, including the visual analog scale (VAS) scores for lumbar and leg pain, as well as the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), were assessed at various postoperative intervals and compared to preoperative values.
Eur Spine J
September 2025
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours, Tours, France.
Purpose: Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) represents an increasing challenge due to the aging population. The natural course of untreated DLSS is largely unknown. For the acute DLSS decompensations, the main concern remains the opportunity and timing of surgery, i.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Orthop Relat Res
September 2025
Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Background: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is common in adults with achondroplasia and predisposes individuals to neurogenic claudication. It remains unverified whether the severity of stenosis in patients with achondroplasia is associated with clinical outcomes. Similarly, the role of sagittal balance parameters in clinical outcomes has not been determined.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGlobal Spine J
September 2025
Hôpital de Chicoutimi, Chicoutimi, QC, Canada.
Eur Spine J
September 2025
Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine through a Delphi process a list of outcomes measures for clinicians to use when assessing individuals with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (LSS).
Methods: A three-phase Delphi process was conducted by the International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine (ISSLS) Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Taskforce, including two online surveys, two virtual meetings, and three in-person consensus meetings at the ISSLS annual conferences (2023-2025). Participants evaluated and ranked outcome measures for LSS, with final endorsement requiring > 66% agreement.