98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objectives: The population is aging and falls are a common reason for emergency department visits. Appropriate imaging in this population is important. The objectives of this study were to estimate the prevalence of cervical spine injury and identify factors associated with cervical spine injuries in adults ≥ 65 years after low-level falls.
Methods: This was a pre-specified sub-study of a prospective observational cohort study of intracranial bleeding in emergency patients ≥ 65 years presenting after low-level falls. The primary outcome was cervical spine injury. The risk factors of interest were Glasgow coma scale (GCS) < 15, head injury, neck pain, age, and frailty defined as Clinical Frailty Scale ≥ 5. Multivariable logistic regression was used to measure the strength of association between risk factors and cervical spine injury. A descriptive analysis of absence of significant risk factors was performed to determine patients who may not require imaging.
Results: There were 4308 adults ≥ 65 who sustained low-level falls with mean age of 82.0 (standard deviation ± 8.8) years and 1538 (35.7%) were male; 23 [0.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.3-0.8%)] were diagnosed with cervical spine injuries. The adjusted odds ratios and 95% CIs were 1.3 (0.5-3.2) for GCS < 15, 5.3 (1.7-26.7) for head injury, 13.0 (5.7-31.2) for new neck pain, 1.4 (1.0-1.8) for 5-year increase in age, and 1.1 (0.4-2.9) for frailty. Head injury or neck pain identified all 23 cervical spine injuries. Management was a rigid collar in 19/23 (82.6%) patients and none had surgery.
Conclusions: In emergency patients ≥ 65 years presenting after a low-level fall, head injury, neck pain, and older age were associated with the diagnosis of cervical spine injury. There were no cervical spine injuries in those without head injury or neck pain. Patients with no head injury or neck pain may not require cervical spine imaging.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43678-024-00752-x | DOI Listing |
Neurosurg Rev
September 2025
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Purpose: To share our clinical experience with conservative management of isolated spinal arterial aneurysms (ISAs) and to identify clinical scenarios where conservative management may be appropriate, in the context of a literature review.
Methods: We performed a retrospective review of spinal angiograms from two German neuroradiology centers and conducted a systematic literature review of reported ISA cases. We analyzed demographics, clinical presentation, imaging findings, treatments, and outcomes.
Clin Spine Surg
September 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spine Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York City, New York.
Study Design: Narrative review.
Objective: Summarize current classification systems, preoperative considerations, surgical approaches, and outcomes in patients with cervical deformity.
Summary Of Background Data: Cervical deformity (CD) is a complex pathology with varying presentations.
Clin Spine Surg
September 2025
Department of Neurosurgery, Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Lane.
Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Objective: To characterise patients admitted to a UK tertiary centre with OPLL over a 10-year period.
Summary Of Background Data: OPLL is a progressive degenerative condition that can lead to myelopathy.
Clin Spine Surg
September 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Study Design: Narrative review.
Objective: To synthesize current knowledge on radiographic parameters, classification systems, and compensatory mechanisms essential to the diagnosis and surgical planning of cervical spine deformity (CD) correction.
Summary Of Background Data: CD encompasses a heterogeneous set of conditions associated with neurological impairment and impaired health-related quality of life.
N Am Spine Soc J
September 2025
Orthopedic Research Department, 31 Seymour St. Hartford HealthCare Bone and Joint Institute, Hartford, CT, 06106 United States.
Background: The reliance on patient reported outcomes (PROs) has substantially increased not only to augment current metrics of clinical success, but to capture the patient's perspective on the benefit of their treatment. As more PROs become utilized, the time and cost of longitudinal data collection and survey fatigue must be tempered with the benefit of the data collected. Therefore, this study sought to assess the responsiveness of the Neck Disability Index (NDI) compared to the PROMIS-10 Global Health Survey physical function T-score (PFT) and mental health T-score (MHT).
View Article and Find Full Text PDF