A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Vision Improvement in Keratoconus Patients Trained With Perceptual Learning: A Randomized Controlled Trial. | LitMetric

Vision Improvement in Keratoconus Patients Trained With Perceptual Learning: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Am J Ophthalmol

From the State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology (X.-H.T., M.-Y.W., J.-Y.J., D.L., S.-S.C., C.-Q.X., X.-Y.L., Y.H., X.Y.), Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocu

Published: January 2025


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the effectiveness and maintenance of perceptional learning (PL) on vision improvement in keratoconus (KC) patients corrected with spectacles.

Design: Randomized, double-blind clinical trial.

Methods: Non-progressive KC patients 9 years of age or older who had best spectacle-corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of 0 to 1.0 logMAR (Snellen equivalent range 20/20 to 20/200) and who were contact lenses intolerant were enrolled. Eligible subjects were randomized into PL and control groups to receive PL and placebo training for 3 months, respectively. Spectacle-corrected visual acuity, contrast sensitivity function (CSF), stereoacuity, and visual functioning and quality of life were measured at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months of follow-up. Statistics were analyzed following the intention-to-treat principle.

Results: After 3 months of training, the CDVA of patients in the PL group improved as compared to the placebo group (0.17 ± 0.15 logMAR vs 0.02 ± 0.06 logMAR; P = .0006). Eight of 17 (47.06%) patients in the PL group reached CDVA improvement ≥2 lines (P = .0010). This improvement persisted for at least 6 months (from baseline) as compared to the placebo group (0.17 ± 0.17 logMAR vs 0.01 ± 0.07 logMAR; P = .0011). The increase in CSF in the PL group mainly was found for moderate spatial frequency (0.11 ± 0.17 log units at 3 cpd; 0.12 ± 0.19 log units at 6 cpd). Linear regression indicated that patients with worse initial CDVA achieved better gains in CDVA after PL (P = .009). No side effects were observed, and no subjects withdrew from the study because of training difficulties.

Conclusions: Three-month PL improved vision in KC patients, and the improvement was maintained after 3 months of treatment cessation. The results indicate that PL may be a promising therapy for KC patients with unsatisfied spectacle-corrected visual acuity.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2024.08.032DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

visual acuity
12
vision improvement
8
improvement keratoconus
8
patients
8
keratoconus patients
8
spectacle-corrected visual
8
patients group
8
compared placebo
8
placebo group
8
group 017
8

Similar Publications