A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Retinal layer thinning for monitoring disease-modifying treatment in relapsing multiple sclerosis-Evidence for applying a rebaselining concept. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Employing a rebaselining concept may reduce noise in retinal layer thinning measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT).

Methods: From an ongoing prospective observational study, we included patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS), who had OCT scans at disease-modifying treatment (DMT) start (baseline), 6-12 months after baseline (rebaseline), and ⩾12 months after rebaseline. Mean annualized percent loss (aL) rates (%/year) were calculated both from baseline and rebaseline for peripapillary-retinal-nerve-fiber-layer (aLpRNFL/aLpRNFL) and macular-ganglion-cell-plus-inner-plexiform-layer (aLGCIPL/aLGCIPL) by mixed-effects linear regression models.

Results: We included 173 RMS patients (mean age 31.7 years (SD 8.8), 72.8% female, median disease duration 15 months (12-94) median baseline-to-last-follow-up-interval 37 months (18-71); 56.6% moderately effective DMT (M-DMT), 43.4% highly effective DMT (HE-DMT)). Both mean aLpRNFL and aLGCIPL significantly increased in association with relapse (0.51% and 0.26% per relapse, < 0.001, respectively) and disability worsening (1.10% and 0.48%, < 0.001, respectively) before baseline, but not with DMT class. Contrarily, neither aLpRNFL nor aLGCIPL was dependent on relapse or disability worsening before baseline, while HE-DMT significantly lowered aLpRNFL (by 0.31%, < 0.001) and aLGCIPL (0.25%, < 0.001) compared with M-DMT.

Conclusions: Applying a rebaselining concept significantly improves differentiation of DMT effects on retinal layer thinning by avoiding carry-over confounding from previous disease activity.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13524585241267257DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

retinal layer
12
layer thinning
12
rebaselining concept
12
disease-modifying treatment
8
relapsing multiple
8
applying rebaselining
8
baseline rebaseline
8
effective dmt
8
alprnfl algcipl
8
disability worsening
8

Similar Publications