Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

This study aimed to verify the relationship between changes in thigh muscle-localized bioelectrical impedance analysis (ML-BIA) parameters and performance in a multiple-set exercise. The sample consisted of 30 female university students (22.1 ± 3.2 years). The ML-BIA parameters, including localized muscle resistance (ML-R), reactance (ML-Xc), and phase angle (ML-AngF), were evaluated using a tetrapolar bioelectric impedance device operating at a frequency of 50 KHz. The multiple sets protocol was performed with an isokinetic dynamometer. For body composition, total and leg lean soft tissue (LST) were evaluated using dual X-ray absortiometry. Student's t-test for paired samples was used to compare the ML-BIA parameters and thigh circumference pre and postexercise. Linear regression analysis was performed to verify the ∆ML-PhA as a predictor of peak torque for the three sets alone while controlling for total and leg LST. There were differences in the ML-R (∆ = 0.02 ± 1.45 Ω; p = 0.001; and E.S = 0.19), ML-Xc (∆ = 2.90 ± 4.12 Ω; p = 0.043; and E.S = 0.36), and thigh circumference (∆ = 0.82 ± 0.60 cm; p < 0.001; and E.S = 0.16) pre- and post-multiple sets. ΔML-PhA was a predictor of performance in the first set (p = 0.002), regardless of total and leg LST. However, the ΔML-PhA lost its explanatory power in the other sets (second and third), and the variables that best explained performance were total and leg LST. The ML-BIA (ML-R and ML-Xc) parameters were sensitive and changed after the multiple sets protocol, and the ΔML-PhA was a predictor of performance in the first set regardless of the total and leg LST.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11369348PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsc.12167DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ml-bia parameters
12
muscle-localized bioelectrical
8
bioelectrical impedance
8
impedance analysis
8
parameters performance
8
isokinetic dynamometer
8
total leg
8
thigh circumference
8
association muscle-localized
4
parameters
4

Similar Publications

Acute effects of different muscle fatigue conditions during strength training on localized muscle bioimpedance in women.

J Electromyogr Kinesiol

October 2025

Biotechnology and Exercise Biology Research Laboratory, Institute of Physical Education and Sports, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil; Graduate Program in Biotechnology, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.

This study aims to compare the localized muscle bioimpedance (ML-BIA) responses under different muscle fatigue conditions during strength training (ST). Twelve women participated in the study, which followed a crossover, counterbalanced, and randomized design. The experimental sessions were conducted using a 45° leg press machine, consisting of two conditions: a session until muscle failure (MF) and a session with no muscle failure (NMF).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Sprint and jump performance are determined by localized BIA - an ecological study in track and field adolescent athletes.

BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil

November 2024

Laboratory of Growth and Development, Center for Investigation in Pediatrics, School of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Background: Raw data obtained through bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) have been applied in different populations to assess body fluids and cell integrity. Assessing raw BIA parameters in specific muscles is an emerging method for evaluating muscle function. We investigated the associations of the BIA-derived variables of resistance (R), reactance (Xc) and phase angle (PhA) measured through whole-body (WB) and muscle-localized (ML) methods with performance in the countermovement jump (CMJ) and 50-meter (m) sprint.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study aimed to verify the relationship between changes in thigh muscle-localized bioelectrical impedance analysis (ML-BIA) parameters and performance in a multiple-set exercise. The sample consisted of 30 female university students (22.1 ± 3.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF