Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) is considered the gold standard for the assessment of left ventricular (LV) systolic function. However, discrepancies have been reported in the literature between LV volumes assessed by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and cMRI. The objective of this study was to analyze the differences in LV volumes between different echocardiographic techniques and cMRI.

Methods And Results: In 64 male athletes (21.1 ± 4.9 years), LV volumes were measured by TTE using the following methods: Doppler echocardiography, anatomical M-Mode, biplane/triplane planimetry and 3D volumetry. In addition, LV end-diastolic (LVEDV), end-systolic (LVESV), and stroke volumes (LVSV) were assessed in 11 athletes by both TTE and cMRI. There was no significant difference between LVEDV and LVESV determined by biplane/triplane planimetry and 3D volumetry. LVEDV and LVESV measured by M-Mode were significantly lower compared to 3D volumetry. LVSV determined by Doppler with 3D planimetry of LV outflow tract was significantly higher than 2D planimetry and 3D volumetry, whereas none of the planimetric or volumetric methods for determining LVSV differed significantly. There were no significant differences for LVEDV, LVESV, LVSV and LVEF between cMRI and TTE determined by biplane planimetry in the subgroup of 11 athletes.

Conclusion: The choice of echocardiographic method used has an impact on LVSV in athletes, so the LVSV should always be checked for plausibility. The same echocardiographic method should be used to assess LVSV at follow-ups to ensure good comparability. The data suggest that biplane LV planimetry by TTE is not inferior to cMRI.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-024-02504-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

planimetry volumetry
12
lvedv lvesv
12
assessment left
8
left ventricular
8
tte cmri
8
biplane/triplane planimetry
8
biplane planimetry
8
echocardiographic method
8
lvsv
7
planimetry
6

Similar Publications

Background: Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) is considered the gold standard for the assessment of left ventricular (LV) systolic function. However, discrepancies have been reported in the literature between LV volumes assessed by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and cMRI. The objective of this study was to analyze the differences in LV volumes between different echocardiographic techniques and cMRI.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - The study investigates various MRI measures as biomarkers for tracking brain atrophy progression in patients with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), focusing on comparing different staging systems and assessing their effectiveness for clinical trials.
  • - 508 participants were analyzed, including PSP patients and healthy controls, with specific attention given to the brainstem and midbrain volumes, which showed the most significant changes over one year.
  • - Results suggest that automated atlas-based volumetry is more sensitive and requires smaller sample sizes than other methods for detecting atrophy progression in PSP, potentially aiding in the evaluation of treatment efficacy in clinical trials.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Various MRI markers-including midbrain and pons areas (M, P) and volumes (M, P), ratios (M/P, M/P), and composite markers (magnetic resonance imaging Parkinsonism Indices 1,2; MRPI 1,2)-have been proposed as imaging markers of Richardson's syndrome (RS) and multiple system atrophy-Parkinsonism (MSA-P). A systematic review/meta-analysis of relevant studies aiming to compare the diagnostic accuracy of these imaging markers is lacking.

Methods: Pubmed and Scopus were searched for studies with >10 patients (RS, MSA-P or CBS) and >10 controls with data on M, P, M, P, M/P, M/P, MRPI 1, and MRPI 2.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Brain MRI is used for diagnosing progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), but the effectiveness of various analysis methods for different PSP types—especially those besides Richardson's syndrome—is uncertain.
  • The study compared three reading strategies for MRI analysis (visual descriptions, manual planimetry, and automatic volumetry) across 41 PSP patients (21 with RS and 20 with variant PSP) and 46 healthy controls.
  • Results showed that while automatic volumetric support led to high accuracy, a machine learning approach (support vector machine) achieved the best overall accuracy (87.4%), with better sensitivity for diagnosing variant PSP cases.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Bleeding in the pelvis can lead to a circulatory problem. The widely used whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) scan in the context of treatment in the trauma resuscitation unit (TRU) can give an idea of the source of bleeding (arterial vs. venous/osseous); however, the volume determination of an intrapelvic hematoma by volumetric planimetry cannot be used for a quick estimation of the blood loss.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF