A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Exploring the potential of 7-T magnetic resonance imaging on patients with clinically significant prostate cancer: visibility and size perspective. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Despite progress in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), issues of prostate cancer invisibility and underestimated tumor burden persist. This study investigates the potential of an ultra-high field MRI at 7-T in an setting to address these limitations.

Methods: This prospective study included 54 tumors from 20 treatment-naïve clinically significant prostate cancer patients, confirmed by biopsy, despite negative findings on preoperative 3-T MRI. 7-T MRI of resected prostates was performed, with assessment on tumor visibility and size. Factors influencing visibility were analyzed using logistic regression analyses.

Results: Tumor visibility was confirmed in 80% of patients, and 48% of all tumors on imaging. Gleason pattern 4 percentage (odds ratio 1.09) and tumor size on pathology (odds ratio 1.36) were significantly associated with visibility ( < 0.05). Mean MRI-visible and invisible tumor sizes were 10.5 mm and 5.3 mm, respectively. The size discrepancy between MRI and pathology was 2.7 mm.

Conclusion: Tumor visibility on 7-T MRI was influenced by tumor grade and size. The notable tumor visibility initially overlooked on 3-T MRI, along with small size discrepancy with pathology, suggests potential improvements in resolution.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11255944PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2024.02.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

prostate cancer
12
magnetic resonance
8
resonance imaging
8
clinically prostate
8
visibility size
8
mri 7-t
8
tumor visibility
8
odds ratio
8
visibility
5
exploring potential
4

Similar Publications