A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Incidence and predictors of device-related thrombus after left atrial appendage closure with Watchman device. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Introduction: Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) with Watchman device prevents thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, thrombus may develop on the atrial surface of the device.

Aim: To investigate the incidence and predictors of device-related thrombus (DRT) in patients with AF who were treated with LAAC.

Material And Methods: Ninety-one consecutive patients with AF underwent LAAC procedure using first-generation Watchman 2.5 device followed by antiplatelet therapy. In our analysis we have included all patients ( = 78) who had clinical follow-up visits with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) after the procedure.

Results: The median (IQR) CHADS-VASc score was 4 (4.0-6.0) and HAS-BLED score was 3 (3.0-4.0). DRTs were observed in 5 (6.4%) patients. When compared with patients without DRT, those with DRT presented more often with lower median ejection fraction (40% (23.5-45.5) versus 55% (48.0-60.0); = 0.005), lower emptying velocity of LAA (25 cm/s (17.5-27.0) versus 53 cm/s (26.5-78.0); = 0.009), and with greater depth of implantation (18 mm (14.0-20.5) versus 8 mm (5.0-11.0); < 0.001). Furthermore, patients with DRT had greater depth of LAA (35 mm (29.5-41.0) versus 29 mm (25.5-31.0); = 0.003), greater mean (SD) dimension in 90 (22.4 mm (3.2) versus 19 mm (2.7); = 0.02). Patients with DRT were also younger than those without DRT (67.4 years (7) versus 75 years (8.3), = 0.045).

Conclusions: The DRT after Watchman device implantation remains a rare complication. Its formation was related to several patient and procedural characteristics, which need to be confirmed in larger studies.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11249867PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aic.2024.140315DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

watchman device
16
patients drt
12
incidence predictors
8
predictors device-related
8
device-related thrombus
8
left atrial
8
atrial appendage
8
appendage closure
8
patients
8
greater depth
8

Similar Publications