A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Lessons learned from follow up of spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with artery saving and vein sacrificing. | LitMetric

Lessons learned from follow up of spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with artery saving and vein sacrificing.

Gland Surg

Division of Hepato-biliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Published: June 2024


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: The Warshaw method as a technique for spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SPDP) carries the risk of splenic infarction following splenic artery ligation. This study introduces a modified Warshaw method, which preserves the splenic artery while sacrificing the splenic vein, and compares its outcomes with the traditional Warshaw method.

Methods: According to the bleeding status during vessel dissection, either the Warshaw method (group W) or the modified Warshaw method (group MW) was used. Guided by preoperative imaging, we utilized the planned modified Warshaw method (group PMW) when the splenic vein was embedded in the pancreatic parenchyma.

Results: Group MW demonstrated a lower incidence of splenic infarction and engorged gastric collaterals than group W (6.3% 69.8%, P<0.001; 25.0% 55.8%, P=0.003, respectively). There were no significant differences in perioperative changes of splenic volume between the two groups. Group PMW experienced less estimated blood loss than group W (71.9±59.13 357.9±447.72 cc, P=0.006).

Conclusions: The planned modified Warshaw method is an efficient and safe technique, resulting in lower estimated blood loss and favorable outcomes concerning splenic infarction and gastric collaterals than the Warshaw method without inducing congestive splenomegaly.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11247568PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gs-24-55DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

warshaw method
20
modified warshaw
12
method group
12
spleen-preserving distal
8
distal pancreatectomy
8
splenic infarction
8
splenic artery
8
splenic vein
8
warshaw
6
splenic
6

Similar Publications