98%
921
2 minutes
20
Introduction: The combination of tacrolimus/mTORi compared to tacrolimus/mycophenolate (MMF) was shown to be safe in the TRANSFORM trial. For donors with a high KDPI (Kidney Donor Profile Index), however, there are no data to support the effectiveness of this regimen. The main objective of this study was to explore the influence of the KDPI on 12-month renal function (eGFR) in patients receiving mTORi or MMF.
Methods: Multicenter cohort study of four Brazilian services that use the tacrolimus with mTORi as a protocol. Data from 2008 to 2018 of the tacrolimus/mycophenolate (MMF) and tacrolimus/mTORi (mTORi) regimens in renal transplant recipients over 18 years old were collected. For better homogeneity, the propensity score was used. Afterward, the method used for group selection ("match") was the K-nearest neighbor (KNN) method. New analyses were performed on this new balanced sample, and two different subsamples were constituted based on the median KDPI.
Results: The global analysis ( = 870) showed that the major determinant of worse kidney function was high KDPI. Afterward, the three strata were analyzed. In the first stratum (KDPI up to 50), 242 patients were evaluated, with 121 in each group. The eGFR was 64 ml/min/1.73 m2 in the mTORi group compared to 63 in the MMF group, = 0.4, and when imputed eGFR was evaluated, 61 in the mTORi and 53 in the MMF, = 0.065. In the second stratum (KDPI from 50 to 85), 282 patients were evaluated, with 141 in each group. eGFR was 46 ml/min/1.73 m2 in mTORi compared to 48 in MMF, = 0.4, and when imputed eGFR was evaluated, 40 mTORi and 41 MMF, = 0.8. In the last stratum (KDPI higher than 85) with = 126 and 63 cases per group, eGFR was 36 ml/min/1.73 m2 in mTORi compared to 39 in MMF, = 0.2, and when imputed eGFR was evaluated, 30 mTORi and 34 MMF, = 0.2.
Discussion: The regimen using mTOR inhibitor is an effective and safe regimen when compared to the standard regimen. In addition, the scheme seems to offer additional protection against infections and may be an important ally in cases of high risk for these pathologies.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11235318 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frtra.2023.1279940 | DOI Listing |
J Bras Nefrol
July 2025
Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Departamento de Medicina, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Introduction: The Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) has not been previously validated in Brazil, thus this study aimed to investigate the association between the index and one-year outcomes in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) of standard criteria donors (SCD).
Methods: Retrospective cohort analysis including 1,943 KTRs who received kidneys from SCD between 2013 and 2017. The primary outcome was composed of death, graft loss, and 1-yr-graft function <30 mL/min/1.
Front Transplant
October 2023
Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Botucatu, Brazil.
Introduction: The combination of tacrolimus/mTORi compared to tacrolimus/mycophenolate (MMF) was shown to be safe in the TRANSFORM trial. For donors with a high KDPI (Kidney Donor Profile Index), however, there are no data to support the effectiveness of this regimen. The main objective of this study was to explore the influence of the KDPI on 12-month renal function (eGFR) in patients receiving mTORi or MMF.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Transplant
July 2016
Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Since March 26, 2012, the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) has been provided with all deceased-donor kidney offers, with the goal of improving the expanded criteria donor (ECD) indicator. Although an improved risk index may facilitate identification and transplantation of marginal yet viable kidneys, a granular percentile system may reduce provider-patient communication flexibility, paradoxically leading to more discards ("labeling effect"). We studied the discard rates of the kidneys recovered for transplantation between March 26, 2010 and March 25, 2012 ("ECD era," N = 28 636) and March 26, 2012 and March 25, 2014 ("KDPI era," N = 29 021) using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) data.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF