A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Deep learning for predicting rehospitalization in acute heart failure: Model foundation and external validation. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Aims: Assessing the risk for HF rehospitalization is important for managing and treating patients with HF. To address this need, various risk prediction models have been developed. However, none of them used deep learning methods with real-world data. This study aimed to develop a deep learning-based prediction model for HF rehospitalization within 30, 90, and 365 days after acute HF (AHF) discharge.

Methods And Results: We analysed the data of patients admitted due to AHF between January 2014 and January 2019 in a tertiary hospital. In performing deep learning-based predictive algorithms for HF rehospitalization, we use hyperbolic tangent activation layers followed by recurrent layers with gated recurrent units. To assess the readmission prediction, we used the AUC, precision, recall, specificity, and F1 measure. We applied the Shapley value to identify which features contributed to HF readmission. Twenty-two prognostic features exhibiting statistically significant associations with HF rehospitalization were identified, consisting of 6 time-independent and 16 time-dependent features. The AUC value shows moderate discrimination for predicting readmission within 30, 90, and 365 days of follow-up (FU) (AUC:0.63, 0.74, and 0.76, respectively). The features during the FU have a relatively higher contribution to HF rehospitalization than features from other time points.

Conclusions: Our deep learning-based model using real-world data could provide valid predictions of HF rehospitalization in 1 year follow-up. It can be easily utilized to guide appropriate interventions or care strategies for patients with HF. The closed monitoring and blood test in daily clinics are important for assessing the risk of HF rehospitalization.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11631275PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14918DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

deep learning-based
12
deep learning
8
rehospitalization
8
assessing risk
8
risk rehospitalization
8
real-world data
8
deep
5
features
5
learning predicting
4
predicting rehospitalization
4

Similar Publications