Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Which is more suitable as a sensing material between metal single-atoms and nanoparticles? Herein, electrocatalytic behaviors of copper single-atoms (Cu SAs) and copper nanoparticles (CuNPs) toward HO reduction and glucose oxidation were studied. Surprisingly, the electrocatalytic activity of Cu SAs and CuNPs showed significant differences in HO reduction and glucose oxidation. Compared with CuNPs, Cu SAs exhibit outstanding activity in the electrocatalytic reduction of HO but exhibit weak activity in the electrocatalytic oxidation of glucose. On the contrary, CuNPs exhibit excellent activity in the electrochemical oxidation of glucose but have very weak electrocatalytic activity towards HO reduction. DFT results show that HO reduction is more favourable with Cu SAs; however, the electrochemical oxidation of glucose with CuNPs requires overcoming much lower energy barriers than that with Cu SAs. This study proves that both metal single-atoms and nanoparticles are not omnipotent, which provides ideas for constructing highly active sensing materials.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d4nr01926a | DOI Listing |