Exploring Ethical Dimensions in Neuropalliative Care.

Semin Neurol

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Published: October 2024


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Neurologic illnesses can be challenging to diagnose, involve changes in consciousness, and are often complicated by prognostic uncertainty. These disorders can affect how individuals interact with their environment, and as a result, many ethical concerns may arise related to their medical care. Key ethical issues in neuropalliative care include shared decision-making, evolving autonomy and capacity, best interest and harm principles, beneficence and nonmaleficence, futile and inappropriate care, justice and equity, and ableism. The four core principles of medical ethics, beneficence, nonmaleficence, justice, and autonomy, are foundational in considering approaches to these ethical challenges. Shared decision-making is rooted in the principle of autonomy. Evolving autonomy and capacity evoke autonomy, beneficence, and nonmaleficence. The best interest and harm principles are rooted in beneficence and nonmaleficence. Questions of futility and inappropriate care are founded in the principles of nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice. Ableism invokes questions of nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice. Practitioners of neurology will encounter ethical challenges in their practice. Framing decisions around the core ethical principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice will help clinicians navigate challenging situations while acknowledging and respecting each patient's individual story.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787775DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

beneficence nonmaleficence
20
nonmaleficence autonomy
12
autonomy justice
12
neuropalliative care
8
shared decision-making
8
autonomy
8
evolving autonomy
8
autonomy capacity
8
best interest
8
interest harm
8

Similar Publications

Diabetes management during the end of life.

Br J Nurs

September 2025

Macmillan Palliative and End of Life Care Practice Educator and Specialist Nurse Practitioner, Northampton General Hospital.

For individuals with diabetes, maintaining optimal glycaemic control is essential to reduce the risk of long-term complications. However, as patients approach the end of life, the emphasis on tight glycaemic targets becomes less relevant. Instead, the primary goal shifts to maintaining blood glucose levels within a range that minimises the risk of hypoglycaemia and prevents symptomatic hyperglycaemia, thereby ensuring comfort and quality of life.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Bio-ethical issues of research in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Monash Bioeth Rev

September 2025

Department of Biochemistry, Cell and Molecular Biology, College of Basic and Applied Sciences, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana.

This paper examines bioethical considerations of research conducted in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), where a notable scarcity persists in literature addressing region-specific bioethical issues. Although bioethics-related activities have encountered challenges surpassing existing protocol safeguards, emerging evidence demonstrates growing recognition of integrated scientific and ethical principles within African medical research. Maintaining research continuity in resource-limited settings necessitates bridging critical gaps between informed consent procedures and participants' actual understanding.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Ethical principles of autonomy and beneficence guide clinical decision making. Little is known about how clinicians prioritize these principles and integrate them with virtue ethics when assessing the ethics of persuasion.

Objective: Survey medical students about their attitudes and experiences regarding the use of persuasion by physicians in shared decision making.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The World Medical Association's Declaration of Helsinki (DoH) serves as a key document of ethical guidance advocating principles of medical research involving human participants. Since its inception in 1964, the DoH has undergone several revisions, reflecting a dynamic evolution in our understanding of research ethics, spurred by gaps identified within the document, harms discovered, challenges identified during ongoing research activities, scientific advancements and societal shifts in values. The DoH addresses a challenge and a conflict that may arise between two key aspects of medical research: On one hand, the fundamental obligation of physicians to do no harm, and on the other, the essential need to ensure the efficacy and safety of medical interventions by testing them on human research participants or healthy volunteers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This editorial examines the feasibility and ethical implications of integrating robotic-assisted orthopaedic surgery into South Africa's healthcare system. While such technologies are well-established in high-income settings, enhancing surgical precision, reproducibility and postoperative outcomes, their widespread adoption in resource-limited contexts poses considerable logistical, financial and ethical challenges. The South African health landscape, marked by stark disparities between public and private sectors, provides a unique setting in which to assess whether such innovations should be prioritised over more pressing service delivery needs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF