The evolution and impact of the Society for Vascular Surgery Resident and Student Program.

Objective: There is an ongoing national shortage in the vascular surgery (VS) workforce. To increase interest in the specialty, the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) Resident and Student Outreach Committee (RSOC) developed a dedicated general surgery (GS) resident and medical student (MS) program at the Vascular Annual Meeting (VAM) and invested in a scholarship program to help reduce attendee expenses. This study assesses the program's effectiveness, correlating recipient feedback with the likelihood of matching into a VS training program.

Methods: Records related to the SVS VAM GS resident and MS program from 2013 to 2023 were reviewed, focusing on attendee evaluations of the program. The program included a simulation session from 2013 to 2019. VS training program match rates among scholarship recipients were determined. The annual average match rate in VS was used to divide the survey responses into two groups: below average (BA) and above average (AA) match rate groups. Survey responses were based on a 5-point Likert scale and allowed for comments. Responses were divided into high value, strongly favoring the activity (scores 4-5), and low value (scores 1-3) categories. The survey responses from the group of years with AA match rates were compared with the group of years with BA rates.

Results: The SVS awarded 1040 GS resident and MS travel scholarships over the 10 years assessed. Overall, applicants had a 43% success rate in receiving a scholarship. During the study period, the annual number of applicants increased, whereas the number of scholarships and match success rates significantly decreased. The average match rate into VS among scholarship recipients was 50.2%. The survey response rate was 33%. During AA match rate years, evaluations for simulation allotted time and lectures were significantly more likely to be high value compared with BA years. Simulation content and the residency fair consistently had the most favorable evaluations (>90% high value), and overall, the program had a consistently positive impact on recipients' interest in VS (>90% high value). Trainees in the AA group were significantly more likely to provide positive comments (73% vs 55%; P < .001). Numerous recipients commented on the need for a dedicated space to interact with faculty and mentors and highlighted simulation as the standout aspect of the program.

Conclusions: The SVS VAM RSOC program is positively correlated with attendee interest in VS, with approximately 50% of scholarship recipients matching into the field. The quality of the program and the number of scholarships correlate with VS match rates. Additional investments in similar programs could help close the workforce gap.