Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
The aim of this study was to quantify the diagnostic value of dual-tracer PET/computed tomography (CT) with 11 C-acetate and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in per-lesion and per-patient and its effect on clinical decision-making for choosing the most appropriate management. The study protocol is registered a priori at https://osf.io/rvm75/ . PubMed, Web of Science, Embase , and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies until 1 June 2023. Studies regarding the review question were included. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) was used to assess bias risk. Per-lesion and per-patient diagnostic performance were calculated for: (1) 11 C-acetate alone; (2) FDG alone; and (3) dual tracer of 11 C-acetate and FDG. A direct comparison of these three combinations was made. The possible sources of statistical heterogeneity were also examined. We also calculated the percentage change in clinical decision-making when dual-tracer PET/CT was added to conventional imaging routinely used for metastatic evaluation (CT/MRI). Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations tool was used to evaluate the certainty of evidence. Eight studies including 521 patients and 672 metastatic lesions were included. Dual-tracer PET/CT had a per-lesion sensitivity of 96.3% [95% confidence interval (CI), 91.8-98.4%] and per-patient sensitivity of 95.5% (95% CI, 89.1-98.2%) which were highly superior to either of tracers alone. Per-patient specificity was 98.5% (84.1-99.9%) which was similar to either of tracers alone. Overall, 9.3% (95% CI, 4.7-13.9%) of the patients had their management beneficially altered by adding dual-tracer PET/CT to their conventional CT/MRI results. Dual-tracer PET/CT substantially outperforms single-tracer methods in detecting extrahepatic hepatocellular carcinoma metastases, evidencing its reliability and significant role in refining clinical management strategies based on robust diagnostic performance.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001870 | DOI Listing |