Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Patient-specific 3D computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations have been used previously to identify the impact of injection parameters (e.g. injection location, velocity, etc.) on the particle distribution and the tumor dose during transarterial injection of radioactive microspheres for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. However, these simulations are computationally costly, so we aim to evaluate whether these can be reliably simplified.
Methods: We identified and applied five simplification strategies (i.e. truncation, steady flow modelling, moderate and severe grid coarsening, and reducing the number of cardiac cycles) to a patient-specific CFD setup. Subsequently, we evaluated whether these strategies can be used to (1) accurately predict the CFD output (i.e. particle distribution and tumor dose) and (2) quantify the sensitivity of the model output to a specific injection parameter (injection flow rate).
Results: For both accuracy and sensitivity purposes, moderate grid coarsening is the most reliable simplification strategy, allowing to predict the tumor dose with only a maximal deviation of 1.4 %, and a similar sensitivity (deviation of 0.7 %). The steady strategy performs the worst, with a maximal deviation in the tumor dose of 20 % and a difference in sensitivity of 10 %.
Conclusion: The patient-specific 3D CFD simulations of this study can be reliably simplified by coarsening the grid, decreasing the computational time by roughly 45 %, which works especially well for sensitivity studies.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108732 | DOI Listing |