Endoscopic transorbital approach to the petrous apex: is orbital rim removal worthwhile for the exposure? An anatomical study with illustrative case.

Objective: The endoscopic transorbital approach (ETOA) has been demonstrated to be a feasible ventral route to the petrous apex. Yet, it has been pointed to as a deep and narrow corridor for anterior petrosectomy; particularly, medialization of the instruments can become an issue when targeting the petroclival area. To overcome this limitation, an ETOA with orbital rim removal (ETOA-OR) has been suggested, but not de facto compared, with a transorbital approach without removal of the rim. This addition could augment the surgical exposure and freedom of movement when accessing the petrous apex area.

Methods: Five human cadaveric heads (10 sides) were dissected. First, anterior petrosectomy was performed via a conventional ETOA (without orbital rim removal). Second, en bloc removal of the orbital rim was performed, with enlargement of the orbital craniectomy and, subsequently, further drilling of the medial petrous apex. Qualitative and quantitative comparisons are provided. An illustrative surgical case is also shown.

Results: The transorbital route allowed the authors to perform an anterior petrosectomy in all specimens. The landmarks of bone removal are superposed onto those in the transcranial route. The ETOA-OR increased the volume of craniectomy (from 4.0 mL to 5.5 mL), the lateromedial angulation, and superoinferior angulation of the instruments within the petrous area. Thus, this approach improved the exposure of the medial petroclival area, allowing for an augmented petrosectomy (from 1.4 mL to 2.0 mL, 39.5% increase) and for increased maneuverability, both in the petrous area (from 44.1 cm2 to 76.5 cm2, 73.3% increase) and in the posterior fossa (from 20.2 cm2 to 52.0 cm2, 158% increase). The ETOA-OR was also pragmatically applied to treat a recurrent petroclival meningioma. Complete removal was achieved, the abducens nerve palsy improved, and the trigeminal neuralgia decreased in severity, yet still required medication.

Conclusions: The authors provide the first formal anatomical comparison between the transorbital approach with preservation of the orbital rim and a transorbital approach with removal of the rim to access the petrous apex. In addition, an illustrative case is used as a proof of concept and feasibility. According to the authors' data, the ETOA-OR significantly improves surgical exposure and the surgeon's comfort in this deep region. The bony defect can be reconstructed to avoid cosmetic deformities, maintaining the minimally disruptive concept of transorbital surgery.