No difference in midterm outcomes and complication rate between retroperitoneal and transperitoneal open aortic aneurysm repair in females.

ObjectivesAbdominal Aortic Aneurysms (AAA) in females are less prevalent, have higher expansion rates and experience rupture at smaller diameters than in males. Studies have compared outcomes of the retroperitoneal (RP) and transperitoneal (TP) approach in open aortic aneurysm repair (OAR) with conflicting results. No study to date has compared the two approaches solely in females. In this study we compare midterm outcomes of the RP and TP approach in females undergoing OAR.MethodsSingle-center, retrospective review of all females undergoing OAR from 2010 to 2021. Patients undergoing elective, symptomatic and ruptured OAR were included. The cohort was stratified by surgical approach RP versus TP and midterm outcomes were compared amongst the groups. Outcomes included mortality, graft related, and non-graft related complications.ResultsA total of 244 patients (RP = 133; TP = 111) were identified. Follow-up period was 28 ± 30.7 months. Baseline perioperative characteristics were similar except that more people in the RP group had ejection fraction ((EF) > 50% (82% vs 68%), = .037). Patients who underwent RP repair had longer visceral/renal ischemia time ( = .01), larger graft diameter (18 vs 16 mm; = <0.001), were more likely to have a suprarenal clamp placed(70.5 vs 48.2; < .001), and had decreased autotransfusion volume (611 vs 861 mL; < .01) compared to those who underwent TP repair. Number of deaths was higher in the TP group during study follow-up period (36.4 vs 23.8; = .035), but the difference of the time to event analysis was not significant. There was no difference in all-cause survival at 36 months between RP and TP (77.8 vs 76.8; = .045). Overall midterm complications were 9.5% in both groups. Any graft related complication was 1.8% in TP versus 3% RP ( = .69). In a multivariable model, after adjusting for age, urgency, smoking, prior aneurysm repair, and ASA level, the hazard ratio decreases with the RP approach, however this did not reach significance ( = .052).ConclusionIn a 12-year period of OAR in females, TP and RP results were comparable at midterm analysis. The RP approach appeared to be used more often for OAR requiring suprarenal clamping. Although the TP group had increased mortality, the difference of the time to event analysis was not significant. Midterm postoperative complications in both groups were low. This suggests that both approaches are safe in the female population and decision should be driven by anatomy and surgeon's preference.