Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: The open-label, phase III EVOKE-01 study evaluated sacituzumab govitecan (SG) versus standard-of-care docetaxel in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) with progression on/after platinum-based chemotherapy, anti-PD-(L)1, and targeted treatment for actionable genomic alterations (AGAs). Primary analysis is reported.

Methods: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 (stratified by histology, best response to last anti-PD-(L)1-containing regimen, and AGA treatment received or not) to SG (one 10 mg/kg intravenous infusion on days 1 and 8) or docetaxel (one 75 mg/m intravenous infusion on day 1) in 21-day cycles. Primary end point was overall survival (OS). Key secondary end points were investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, patient-reported symptom assessment, and safety.

Results: In the intention-to-treat population (SG, n = 299; docetaxel, n = 304), 55.4% had one previous line of therapy. Median follow-up was 12.7 months (range, 6.0-24.0). The primary end point was not met. There was a numerical OS improvement for SG versus docetaxel (median, 11.1 9.8 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.84 [95% CI, 0.68 to 1.04]; one-sided = .0534), consistent across squamous and nonsquamous histologies. Median PFS was 4.1 versus 3.9 months (HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.77 to 1.11]). An OS benefit was observed for SG (n = 192) versus docetaxel (n = 191) in mNSCLC nonresponsive to last anti-PD-(L)1-containing regimen (3.5-month median OS increase; HR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.58 to 0.97]); this was consistent across histologies. Among patients receiving SG and docetaxel, 6.8% and 14.2% discontinued because of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), respectively; 1.4% and 1.0%, respectively, had TRAEs leading to death.

Conclusion: Although statistical significance was not met, OS numerically improved with SG versus docetaxel, which was consistent across histologies. Clinically meaningful improvement in OS was noted in mNSCLC nonresponsive to last anti-PD-(L)1-containing regimen. SG was better tolerated than docetaxel and consistent with its known safety profile, with no new safety signals.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11328920PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.24.00733DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

versus docetaxel
16
anti-pd-l1-containing regimen
12
docetaxel
9
sacituzumab govitecan
8
govitecan versus
8
metastatic non-small
8
non-small cell
8
cell lung
8
lung cancer
8
open-label phase
8

Similar Publications

Background: Standard adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (60-66 Gy) following surgery for HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma has excellent oncological control but high treatment morbidity. We aimed to compare toxicity of a 30-36 Gy regimen of de-escalated adjuvant radiotherapy and standard of care treatment.

Methods: We did this phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial in two academic sites in the USA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and adverse effects of combining enzalutamide with docetaxel versus using docetaxel alone in treating metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) that progresses after treatment with abiraterone followed by enzalutamide.

Methods: A retrospective analysis involved 67 mCRPC patients at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University's Urology Department between October 2021 and August 2023. All experienced disease progression after treatment with abiraterone and enzalutamide.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with docetaxel, cisplatin (CDDP), and fluorouracil (5-FU) (i.e. TPF regimen) has yielded favourable outcomes in treating advanced external auditory canal squamous cell carcinoma (EACSCC).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: The randomized GORTEC 2014-01 TPExtreme trial showed no significant improvement in overall survival with TPEx chemotherapy regimen (docetaxel-platinum-cetuximab) versus EXTREME regimen (platinum-fluorouracil-cetuximab) in first line treatment of recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). However, the TPEx regimen had a favorable safety profile, and could provide an alternative to standard of care with the EXTREME regimen in this setting. Our aim was to assess the cost-utility of the TPEx strategy versus EXTREME strategy in the French setting.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We report results of the final analysis of overall survival (OS) and patient-reported outcomes from the phase III KEYNOTE-585 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03221426) study. Participants with previously untreated, locally advanced, resectable gastric and gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer were enrolled into the main (n = 804) and fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT; n = 203) cohorts, and randomly assigned 1:1 to neoadjuvant and adjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy or placebo plus chemotherapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF