98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: The acute coronary syndrome (ACS) continues to be a fundamental indication for revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation remains a part of contemporary practice but permanent caging of the vascular structure with the metallic stent structure may increase the rate of device-related adverse clinical events. As an alternative to classic metallic DESs, the bioresorbable scaffolds (BRSs) have emerged as a temporary vascular support technology. We evaluated the mid-term outcomes of two generations of bioresorbable scaffolds-Absorb (Abbott-Vascular, Chicago, IL, USA) and Magmaris (Biotronik, Germany)-in patients with non-ST-elevation ACS.
Methods: The study cohort consisted of 193 subjects after Magmaris implantation and 160 patients following Absorb implantation in large-vessel lesions.
Results: At 2 years, a significantly lower rate of a primary outcome (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis) was observed with Magmaris (5.2% vs. 15%; = 0.002). In addition, we observed a significantly lower rate of MI in the target vessel (2.6% vs. 9.4%; = 0.009) and a lower rate of scaffold thrombosis (0% vs. 3.7%; = 0.008). The TLF rate between the two groups was not significantly different.
Conclusion: Magmaris demonstrated a good safety profile and more favorable clinical outcomes when compared to Absorb in patients with non-ST-elevation ACS.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11122016 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm14050540 | DOI Listing |
Future Cardiol
September 2025
Department of Internal Medicine, Valley Health System Graduate Medical Education, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
A 71-year-old black male with a history of hypertension, dyslipidemia, type 2 diabetes, history of bladder cancer status-post resection now in remission, history of multiple transient ischemic attacks, and coronary artery disease (CAD) presented with non-exertional substernal chest pain radiating to the left arm, accompanied by shortness of breath and nausea. Initial evaluation revealed elevated troponins and nonspecific electrocardiogram changes, consistent with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. Coronary angiography demonstrated severe multivessel disease, including critical left main stenosis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnn Noninvasive Electrocardiol
September 2025
Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Hitit University, Corum, Turkey.
This letter provides a critical appraisal of the study by Wei et al. on clinical and electrocardiographic predictors of left circumflex artery occlusion in NSTEMI patients. While the authors identified STV5 + STV6 ≥ 2.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEClinicalMedicine
October 2025
Department of Cardiology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Background: The benefits of physiology-guided management in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remain inconclusive due to limited evidence. In our FAVOR III China trial, a quantitative flow ratio (QFR)-based physiology-guided strategy versus standard angiography guidance improved the 1-year primary outcome among participants with coronary artery disease (CAD). We aimed to investigate, in a prespecified analysis, the outcomes of QFR-based physiological guidance in the FAVOR III China participants with low-risk ACS.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Neurosurg Anesthesiol
October 2025
Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
Background: Acute postoperative hypertension (APH) is encountered in patients following craniotomy and is associated with major complications. This retrospective cohort study evaluates 30-day survival for patients who received labetalol, nicardipine, or both drugs.
Methods: Patients 18 and older who underwent craniotomy between January 1, 2010 and January 1, 2023 were included in the study.
Front Cardiovasc Med
August 2025
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
For patients presenting with Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI), the choice and timing of revascularization remain complex and debated. This decision is influenced by clinical factors such as hemodynamic stability, comorbidities and surgical risk profile, as well as anatomical considerations like coronary lesion complexity and feasibility of achieving complete revascularization. Randomized controlled trials directly comparing CABG and PCI in NSTEMI are limited, making evidence-based comparisons challenging.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF