A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

New diagnostic criteria for metopic ridges and trigonocephaly: a 3D geometric approach. | LitMetric

New diagnostic criteria for metopic ridges and trigonocephaly: a 3D geometric approach.

Orphanet J Rare Dis

Service de chirurgie maxillofaciale et chirurgie plastique, Hôpital Necker - Enfants malades, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, CRMR CRANIOST, Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.

Published: May 2024


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Trigonocephaly occurs due to the premature fusion of the metopic suture, leading to a triangular forehead and hypotelorism. This condition often requires surgical correction for morphological and functional indications. Metopic ridges also originate from premature metopic closure but are only associated with mid-frontal bulging; their surgical correction is rarely required. Differential diagnosis between these two conditions can be challenging, especially in minor trigonocephaly.

Methods: Two hundred seven scans of patients with trigonocephaly (90), metopic rigdes (27), and controls (90) were collected. Geometric morphometrics were used to quantify skull and orbital morphology as well as the interfrontal angle and the cephalic index. An innovative method was developed to automatically compute the frontal curvature along the metopic suture. Different machine-learning algorithms were tested to assess the predictive power of morphological data in terms of classification.

Results: We showed that control patients, trigonocephaly and metopic rigdes have distinctive skull and orbital shapes. The 3D frontal curvature enabled a clear discrimination between groups (sensitivity and specificity > 92%). Furthermore, we reached an accuracy of 100% in group discrimination when combining 6 univariate measures.

Conclusion: Two diagnostic tools were proposed and demonstrated to be successful in assisting differential diagnosis for patients with trigonocephaly or metopic ridges. Further clinical assessments are required to validate the practical clinical relevance of these tools.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11102612PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-024-03197-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

metopic ridges
12
patients trigonocephaly
12
trigonocephaly metopic
12
metopic
8
metopic suture
8
surgical correction
8
differential diagnosis
8
metopic rigdes
8
skull orbital
8
frontal curvature
8

Similar Publications