Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: The ClinGen Actionability Working Group (AWG) developed an evidence-based framework to generate actionability reports and scores of gene-condition pairs in the context of secondary findings from genome sequencing. Here we describe the expansion of the framework to include actionability assertions.

Methods: Initial development of the actionability rubric was based on previously scored adult gene-condition pairs and individual expert evaluation. Rubric refinement was iterative and based on evaluation, feedback, and discussion. The final rubric was pragmatically evaluated via integration into actionability assessments for 27 gene-condition pairs.

Results: The resulting rubric has a 4-point scale (limited, moderate, strong, and definitive) and uses the highest-scoring outcome-intervention pair of each gene-condition pair to generate a preliminary assertion. During AWG discussions, predefined criteria and factors guide discussion to produce a consensus assertion for a gene-condition pair, which may differ from the preliminary assertion. The AWG has retrospectively generated assertions for all previously scored gene-condition pairs and are prospectively asserting on gene-condition pairs under assessment, having completed over 170 adult and 188 pediatric gene-condition pairs.

Conclusion: The AWG expanded its framework to provide actionability assertions to enhance the clinical value of their resources and increase their utility as decision aids regarding return of secondary findings.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11298308PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2024.101164DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

gene-condition pairs
16
secondary findings
12
actionability
8
context secondary
8
clingen actionability
8
actionability working
8
working group
8
gene-condition
8
gene-condition pair
8
preliminary assertion
8

Similar Publications

The Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) is a National Institutes of Health-funded program founded 10 years ago that defines the clinical relevance of genes and variants for medical and research use. ClinGen working groups develop standards for data sharing and curating genomic knowledge. Expert panels, with >2500 active members from 67 countries, curate the validity of monogenic disease relationships, pathogenicity of genetic variation, dosage sensitivity of genes, and actionability of gene-disease interventions using ClinGen standards, infrastructure, and curation interfaces.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Research is underway worldwide to investigate the feasibility, acceptability, and utility of sequencing-based newborn screening. Different methods have been used to select gene-condition pairs for screening, leading to highly inconsistent gene lists across studies.

Methods: Early Check developed and utilized actionability-based frameworks for evaluating gene-condition pairs for inclusion in newborn panels (panel 1-high actionability, panel 2-possible actionability).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - The ClinGen Actionability Working Group (AWG) created a framework to evaluate and score gene-condition pairs related to secondary findings from genome sequencing, and recently added actionability assertions to this framework.
  • - The initial rubric was based on previously evaluated pairs, refined through expert feedback, and now uses a 4-point scale to determine the actionability of each gene-condition pair, generating both preliminary and consensus assertions.
  • - Over 170 adult and 188 pediatric gene-condition pairs have been assessed, with the aim of improving clinical decision-making regarding the return of secondary findings from genetic testing.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Synthesis and curation of evidence regarding the clinical actionability of secondary findings (SFs) from genome-scale sequencing are needed to support decision-making on reporting of these findings. To assess actionability of SFs in children and adolescents, the Clinical Genome Resource established the Pediatric Actionability Working Group (AWG).

Methods: The Pediatric AWG modified the framework of the existing Adult AWG, which included production of summary reports of actionability for genes and associated conditions and consensus actionability scores for specific outcome-intervention pairs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Loss-of-function (LoF) mutations associated with disease do not manifest equally in different individuals. The impact of the genetic background on the consequences of LoF mutations remains poorly characterized. Here, we systematically assessed the changes in gene deletion phenotypes for 3,786 gene knockouts in four Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains and 38 conditions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF