98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Doravirine and islatravir is an investigational, once-daily regimen with high antiviral potency, favourable safety and tolerability, and a low propensity for resistance. We investigated a switch from bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide to doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg) in virologically suppressed adults with HIV-1.
Methods: We conducted a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, active-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, non-inferiority trial at 89 research, community, and hospital-based clinics in 11 countries. Adults aged 18 years or older with fewer than 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL for at least 3 months on bictegravir (50 mg), emtricitabine (200 mg), and tenofovir alafenamide (25 mg) and no history of previous virological failure on any past or current regimen were randomly assigned (1:1) by a computer-generated randomisation allocation schedule, with block randomisation based on a block size of four, to switch to doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg) or continue bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide orally once daily, with matching placebos taken by all participants. Participants, investigators, study staff, and sponsor personnel involved in study drug administration or clinical evaluation of participants were masked to treatment assignment until week 48. Participants were instructed at each visit to take one tablet from each of the two bottles received, one of study drug and one of placebo, once daily, and participants were assessed at baseline and weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with greater than or equal to 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL at week 48 in the full analysis set (ie, all participants who received at least one dose of study drug; US Food and Drug Administration snapshot; prespecified non-inferiority margin 4%). The study is ongoing, with all remaining participants in post-treatment follow-up, and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04223791.
Findings: We screened 726 individuals for eligibility between Feb 18 and Sept 3, 2020, of whom 643 (88·6%) participants were randomly assigned to a treatment group (183 [28·5%] women and 460 [71·5%] men). 322 participants were switched to doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg) and 321 continued bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide (two participants [one with a protocol deviation and one who withdrew] assigned to bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide did not receive treatment). The last follow-up visit for the week 48 analysis occurred on Aug 26, 2021. At week 48, two (0·6%) of 322 participants in the doravirine and islatravir group compared with one (0·3%) of 319 participants in the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group had greater than or equal to 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL (difference 0·3%, 95% CI -1·2 to 2·0). The per-protocol analysis showed consistent results. 25 (7·8%) participants in the doravirine and islatravir group had headache compared with 23 [7·2%] participants in the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group; 101 (31·4%) compared with 98 (30·7%) had infections; and eight (2·5%) participants in each group discontinued therapy due to adverse events. 32 (9·9%) participants had treatment-related adverse events in the islatravir and doravirine group comapred with 38 (11·9%) in the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group. In the islatravir and doravirine group, CD4 cell counts (mean change -19·7 cells per μL) and total lymphocyte counts (mean change -0·20 × 10/L) were decreased at 48 weeks.
Interpretation: Switching to daily doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg) was non-inferior to bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide at week 48. However, decreases in CD4 cell and total lymphocyte counts do not support the further development of once-daily doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg).
Funding: Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(24)00030-4 | DOI Listing |
Adv Emerg Nurs J
September 2025
Author Affiliations: San Diego State University School of Nursing, San Diego, California.
Human immunodeficiency viruses (HIV) and, subsequently, acquired immune deficiency syndrome emphasize the significance of prevention and treatment, especially among vulnerable populations. Some subgroups of the LGBTQIA+ community, namely men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender individuals, can be disproportionately affected by this disease. As the health care community recognizes this health concern, post-exposure prophylaxis has become important in preventing HIV spread.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Infect Public Health
September 2025
AP-HP, Hospital Bichat - Claude-Bernard, Infectious and Tropical Diseases Department, IAME UMR 1137 INSERM, Université Paris Cité, France; IMEA, Hospital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Paris, France.
Background: Polymedication and comorbidities are frequent in aging people with HIV (PWH) and often associated with elevated incidences of adverse events (AEs) and drug-drug interactions (DDIs). The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety and practicality of bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF), an antiretroviral (ARV) therapy with limited DDIs, in an elderly virologically-controlled PWH population.
Materials And Methods: This study was prospective, multicentric, single-arm conducted in HIV-1 controlled PWH aged over 65 years who switched from a ritonavir- or cobicistat-boosted containing regimen to B/F/TAF.
HIV Med
September 2025
Moscow Regional AIDS Center, Moscow Region, Kotelniki, Russia.
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of bictegravir (BIC)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) against HIV-1 sub-subtype A6 viruses carrying the L74I polymorphic mutation in integrase.
Methods: A total of 100 ART-naive people living with HIV from the Moscow Regional AIDS Center were enrolled between May and July 2023. HIV-1 subtypes and baseline drug resistance mutations were analysed prior to treatment initiation.
HIV Med
August 2025
Epividian, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Objectives: To compare the virologic effectiveness and discontinuation of the commonly prescribed fixed-dose combination 3-drug and 2-drug regimens, bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) and dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC), in virologically suppressed individuals in routine clinical care in the US.
Methods: From the OPERA cohort, ART-experienced, virologically suppressed (viral load <200 copies/mL) adults with HIV who switched to B/F/TAF or DTG/3TC (01AUG2020-30JUN2022) were followed through 31DEC2022, death, loss to follow-up or discontinuation. Cox proportional hazard models with stabilized inverse probability of treatment weights were used to assess the association between regimen and time to confirmed virologic failure (cVF; 2 viral loads ≥200 copies/mL or 1 viral load ≥200 copies/mL + discontinuation) or time to discontinuation.
Lancet HIV
September 2025
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address:
Background: Patients on second-line protease inhibitor-based regimens in low-income and middle-income countries have high rates of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) resistance, but access to testing is scarce. We aimed to assess the efficacy of combination oral bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide in this population.
Methods: In this open-label non-inferiority trial conducted in Port-au-Prince, Haiti, adults (aged 18 years or older) with viral suppression (HIV-1 RNA <200 copies per mL) on second-line regimens including ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors and two NRTIs were randomised (1:1) using a computer-generated random-number list.