Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

In recent years, especially since the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of predatory journals has increased significantly. Predatory journals exploit the "open-access model" by engaging in deceptive practices such as charging high publication fees without providing the expected quality and performing insufficient or no peer review. Such behaviors undermine the integrity of scientific research and can result in researchers having trouble identifying reputable publication opportunities, particularly early-career researchers who struggle to understand and establish the correct criteria for publication in reputable journals. Publishing in journals that do not fully cover the criteria for scientific publication is also an ethical issue. This review aimed to describe the characteristics of predatory journals, differentiate between reliable and predatory journals, investigate the reasons that lead researchers to publish in predatory journals, evaluate the negative impact of predatory publications on the scientific community, and explore future perspectives. The authors also provide some considerations for researchers (particularly early-career researchers) when selecting journals for publication, explaining the role of metrics, databases, and artificial intelligence in manuscript preparation, with a specific focus on and relevance to publication in veterinary medicine.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvp.13448DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

predatory journals
24
journals
9
veterinary medicine
8
early-career researchers
8
predatory
7
researchers
6
publication
6
narrative review
4
review phenomenon
4
phenomenon predatory
4

Similar Publications

Background: Research quality in Ayush systems of medicine is vital for evidence synthesis and decision-making. As Ayush gains global recognition, analyzing its trends and challenges is important for improving clinical outcomes. However, a comprehensive analysis of research publications is lacking.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Hijacked medical journals rank first via search engine optimization and threaten academic integrity.

Eur J Intern Med

August 2025

Department of Tourism and Hospitality, Faculty of Economics and Business, John von Neumann University, Kecskemét, Hungary; Department of Tourism and Hospitality, Institute of Rural Development and Sustainable Economy, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences (MATE), Gödöllő, Hungary

The rise of questionable journals poses a significant threat to academic integrity, resulting in substantial waste of institutional and university resources. This commentary analysis focuses on six hijacked medical journals, a specific type of questionable publication. We utilized Semrush, an online Search Engine Optimization auditing platform, to analyse our data, which revealed that hijacked journals disseminate their content through search engines.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Traditional peer review (TPR), despite being touted as the bedrock by which scientific knowledge is screened, vetted, and validated, is riddled with biases, limitations, and abuses, reducing not only trust in this publishing model, but overall in the scientific record that claims to be peer-reviewed. Two models that were proposed to fortify the TPR model, open peer review (OPR) and preprints, have themselves shown biases, limitations, and risks of abuse. OPR journals that claim to be peer reviewed should only be rewarded-in terms of indexing and metrics-when they can prove that they have conducted peer review-i.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Questionable publication practices and predatory journals pose an increasing challenge to scientific integrity. These publication models advertise rapid publication times but lack essential quality controls such as peer-review processes, transparency, and charge high fees, which facilitates the dissemination of unreliable research findings. There is an increased risk, particularly for less experienced researchers, of unknowingly publishing in such journals or using their content uncritically.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF