Category Ranking
98%
Total Visits
921
Avg Visit Duration
2 minutes
Citations
20
Article Abstract
Punishment of moral norm violators is instrumental for human cooperation. Yet, social and affective neuroscience research has primarily focused on second- and third-party norm enforcement, neglecting the neural architecture underlying observed (vicarious) punishment of moral wrongdoers. We used naturalistic television drama as a sampling space for observing outcomes of morally-relevant behaviors to assess how individuals cognitively process dynamically evolving moral actions and their consequences. Drawing on Affective Disposition Theory, we derived hypotheses linking character morality with viewers' neural processing of characters' rewards and punishments. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine neural responses of 28 female participants while free-viewing 15 short story summary video clips of episodes from a popular US television soap opera. Each summary included a complete narrative structure, fully crossing main character behaviors (moral/immoral) and the consequences (reward/punishment) characters faced for their actions. Narrative engagement was examined via intersubject correlation and representational similarity analysis. Highest cortical synchronization in 9 specifically selected regions previously implicated in processing moral information was observed when characters who act immorally are punished for their actions with participants' empathy as an important moderator. The results advance our understanding of the moral brain and the role of normative considerations and character outcomes in viewers' engagement with popular narratives.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120613 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Does unfairness evoke anger or disgust? A quantitative neurofunctional dissection based on 25 years of neuroimaging.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev
September 2025
State Key Laboratory for Brain and Cognitive Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, 999077 Hong Kong, China; Department of Psychology, The University of Hong Kong, 999077 Hong Kong, China. Electronic address:
Over the last decades, the traditional 'Homo economicus' model has been increasingly challenged by converging evidence highlighting the critical impact of emotions on decision-making. A classic example is the perception of unfairness in the Ultimatum Game, where humans willingly sacrifice personal gains to punish fairness norm violators. While emotional mechanisms underlying such costly punishment are widely acknowledged, the distinct contributions of moral emotions, particularly anger and disgust, remain debated, partly due to methodological limitations in conventional experiments.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEven if a hiring process is merit-based and non-discriminatory, it may still fail to ensure substantive fairness if some applicants lacked a fair opportunity to develop their qualifications to compete. A familiar potential remedy for the problem is 'affirmative action', in the sense of preferential treatment for job candidates who lacked a fair opportunity to develop their job qualifications. I defend two analogous contentions about criminal justice.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNegotiating autonomy and surveillance: Gendered experiences of shisha smoking among university students in Palestine.
J Ethn Subst Abuse
September 2025
Department of English, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.
Shisha (waterpipe) smoking in Palestine is a social practice shaped by gender norms. This qualitative study examines the experiences of 50 university students (28 females, 22 males) at An-Najah National University, focusing on how shisha use reflects broader negotiations of autonomy, identity, and social control. Thematic analysis identified six themes: shisha as sanctuary and escape; social surveillance and stigma; honor and shame; health discourses and double standards; peer dynamics and gendered exclusion; and agency in redefining womanhood.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe Big Minority View: Do Prescientific Beliefs Underpin Criminal Justice Cruelty, and Is the Public Health Quarantine Model a Remedy?
Int J Environ Res Public Health
July 2025
Nova Institute for Health, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.
Famed lawyer Clarence Darrow (1857-1938) argued strongly for an early-life public health approach to crime prevention, one that focused on education, poverty reduction, and equity of resources. Due to his defense of marginalized persons and his positions that were often at odds with his legal colleagues and public opinion, he was known as the Big Minority Man. He argued that the assumption of free will-humans as free moral agents-justifies systems of inequity, retributive punishment, and "unadulterated brutality.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFProfitable third-party punishment destabilizes cooperation.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
August 2025
Rady School of Management, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093.
Third-party punishment is theorized by some scholars to be essential to the evolution of large-scale cooperation, but empirically, it often fails to bring about its desired effects. Here, we suggest that third-party punishment destabilizes cooperation when third parties have profit motives to punish. Across nine economic games and judgment experiments (including four preregistered studies), we find that when third-party punishment is profitable, rates of cooperation decrease immediately and remain lower even when punishment outcomes are optimized to support cooperative behavior.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF