98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objective: Recovery from acute wheeze and asthma attacks should be supported with safety netting, including treatment advice. We evaluated emergency department (ED) discharge practices for acute childhood wheeze/asthma attacks to describe variation in safety netting and recovery bronchodilator dosing.
Design: Two-phase study between June 2020 and September 2021, comprising (1) Departmental discharge practice survey, and (2) Analysis of written discharge instructions for caregivers.
Setting: Secondary and tertiary EDs in rural and urban settings, from Paediatric Emergency Research in the UK and Ireland (PERUKI).
Main Outcome Measures: Describe practice and variation in discharge advice, treatment recommendations and safety netting provision.
Results: Of 66/71 (93%) participating sites, 62/66 (93.9%) reported providing written safety netting information. 52/66 (78.8%) 'nearly always' assessed inhaler/spacer technique; routine medication review (21/66; 31.8%) and adherence (16/66; 21.4%) were less frequent. In phase II, 61/66 (92.4%) submitted their discharge documents; 50/66 (81.9%) included bronchodilator plans. 11/66 (18.0%) provided Personalised Asthma Action Plans as sole discharge information. 45/50 (90%) provided 'fixed' bronchodilator dosing regimes; dose tapering was common (38/50; 76.0%). Median starting dose was 10 puffs 4 hourly (27/50, 54.0%); median duration was 4 days (29/50, 58.0%). 13/61 (21.3%) did not provide bronchodilator advice for acute deterioration; where provided, 42/48 (87.5%) recommended 10 puffs immediately. Subsequent dosages varied considerably. Common red flags included inability to speak (52/61, 85.2%), inhalers not lasting 4 hours (51/61, 83.6%) and respiratory distress (49/61, 80.3%).
Conclusions: There is variation in bronchodilator dosing and safety netting content for recovery following acute wheeze and asthma attacks. This reflects a lack of evidence, affirming need for further multicentre studies regarding bronchodilator recovery strategies and optimal safety netting advice.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2023-326247 | DOI Listing |
J Adv Nurs
September 2025
School of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK.
Aim: To examine the extent of adherence to high-level principles in remote prescribing and investigate how medical and non-medical prescribers comply with these principles.
Design: Scoping Review.
Data Sources: A systematic search of CINAHL, PubMed, Medline, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Web of Science, and the Ovid Emcare databases was performed.
JAC Antimicrob Resist
April 2025
Department of Paediatric Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Southampton Children's Hospital, Southampton, UK.
Objectives: To improve antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) and reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions in young children in a British primary care setting.
Methods: Forty-nine general practices in the South of England each hosted a 1 h in-house workshop, facilitated by trained local pharmacy professionals. This type of educational outreach approach using TARGET (Target Antibiotics Responsibly, Guidance, Education and Tools) antibiotic materials has previously been shown to reduce antibiotic dispensing in a UK primary care setting.
Parasit Vectors
July 2025
Department of Farm Animal Health, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Background: Since its emergence in Georgia in 2007, the seasonal pattern of African swine fever virus (ASFV) genotype II outbreaks in European pig populations has been evident. It is hypothesized that summer-related farming practices, along with the increased activity and abundance of arthropod vectors during warmer months, contribute to the increased incidence of these outbreaks during this period. This study investigated the potential role of stable flies (Stomoxys calcitrans) and biting midges of the genus Culicoides as mechanical vectors of ASFV.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFN Z Med J
July 2025
BSc(Otago) MBChB(Auck): House Officer/PGY1, Rotorua Hospital, New Zealand.
Aim: The aim was to identify the strengths and weaknesses of safety netting advice given on discharge received by whānau for Kaitaia-domiciled paediatric patients in Aotearoa.
Methods: Semi-structured phone interviews were conducted with whānau of Kaitaia-domiciled paediatric patients who were discharged from either the Kaitaia or Whangārei Hospitals from March 2023 to August 2023. Whānau were primary caregivers of the paediatric patients and were asked 11 questions about different aspects of discharge advice, content and delivery.
Emerg Nurse
July 2025
School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, England.
Safety netting in the emergency department (ED) is provided to patients when their presenting complaint has not completely resolved but they can be safely discharged home. Safety netting involves providing patients, and/or their parents, family members or carers, with verbal and written information about where to go and/or who to contact should they develop any concerning signs and symptoms or if their condition does not resolve as expected. Nurses providing safety netting must ensure they have the knowledge and skills to do so and work within the limits of their competence.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF