98%
921
2 minutes
20
Human-induced global changes, including anthropogenic climate change, biotic globalization, trophic downgrading and pervasive land-use intensification, are transforming Earth's biosphere, placing biodiversity and ecosystems at the forefront of unprecedented challenges. The Anthropocene, characterized by the importance of in shaping the Earth system, necessitates a re-evaluation of our understanding and stewardship of ecosystems. This theme issue delves into the multifaceted challenges posed by the ongoing ecological planetary transformation and explores potential solutions across four key subthemes. Firstly, it investigates the functioning and stewardship of emerging novel ecosystems, emphasizing the urgent need to comprehend the dynamics of ecosystems under uncharted conditions. The second subtheme focuses on biodiversity projections under global change, recognizing the necessity of predicting ecological shifts in the Anthropocene. Importantly, the inherent uncertainties and the complexity of ecological responses to environmental stressors pose challenges for societal responses and for accurate projections of ecological change. The RAD framework (resist-accept-direct) is highlighted as a flexible yet nuanced decision-making tool that recognizes the need for adaptive approaches, providing insights for directing and adapting to Anthropocene dynamics while minimizing negative impacts. The imperative to extend our temporal perspective beyond 2100 is emphasized, given the irreversible changes already set in motion. Advancing methods to study ecosystem dynamics under rising biosphere novelty is the subject of the third subtheme. The fourth subtheme emphasizes the importance of integrating human perspectives into understanding, forecasting and managing novel ecosystems. Cultural diversity and biological diversity are intertwined, and the evolving relationship between humans and ecosystems offers lessons for future stewardship. Achieving planetary stewardship in the Anthropocene demands collaboration across scales and integration of ecological and societal perspectives, scalable approaches fit to changing, novel ecological conditions, as well as cultural innovation. This article is part of the theme issue 'Ecological novelty and planetary stewardship: biodiversity dynamics in a transforming biosphere'.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10999270 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2023.0008 | DOI Listing |
Antibiotics (Basel)
August 2025
ECHO Institute, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, 1650 University Blvd. NE, Albuquerque, NM 87102, USA.
Background/objectives: Strengthening antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs is an invaluable intervention in the ongoing efforts to contain the threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), particularly in low-resource settings. This study evaluates the impact of the Telementoring, Education, and Advocacy Collaboration initiative for Health through Antimicrobial Stewardship (TEACH AMS), which uses the virtual Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) learning model to enhance AMS capacity in Kenya, Ghana, and Malawi.
Methods: A mixed-methods approach was used, which included attendance data collection, facility-level assessments, post-session and follow-up surveys, as well as focus group discussions.
Am J Nurs
September 2025
Kasey Jordan is an assistant professor at the College of Charleston's School of Health Sciences in Charleston, SC. Barbara Polivka is a professor and associate dean of research at the University of Kansas School of Nursing, Kansas City. Elizabeth Schenk is the chief environmental stewardship officer
Climate change is real, present, and impacting the health of people across the world. Mitigation of further climate change is essential, but nurses must also promote adaptation to this new reality by incorporating climate-sensitive care into their day-to-day practice. This article describes key adaptation actions nurses can take to promote patient, organizational, and population health in the context of climate change.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAmbio
August 2025
Centre for Transformative Agriculture and Food Systems, School of Agriculture, Earth, and Environmental Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Scottsville, 3209, South Africa.
This systematic review of 353 studies evaluates the knowledge on foraging by humans, situating it in the wider context of human ecology. We highlight the strengths and weaknesses, and the micro (individual) to macro (landscape) level implications of foraging, as concerns livelihoods and social-ecological systems. Descriptive statistics of ethnobotanical studies yielded 1410 genera foraged globally.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Gen Intern Med
July 2025
Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
In a sociopolitical environment that challenges progress in addressing climate change, physicians should play a central role in accelerating activities related to climate action, environmental sustainability, and resilience. For instance, stewardship as a physician's professional responsibility should include proactive and consistent planetary health stewardship versus a solely reactive and intermittent response to the increasing intensity and frequency of climate-related catastrophic events. We define planetary health stewardship as optimizing physician decision-making to include considerations around the interdependent relationship between human health and the environment, recognizing the need for physicians and their professional societies to address social, economic, and environmental factors that impact human well-being.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBioethics
July 2025
Department of Philosophy, Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
This paper aims to rethink healthcare sustainability from an eco-ethical approach, mainly referring to van Rensselaer Potter's global bioethics and Arne Naess's ecosophy. In this sense, it seeks to address the ethical problem of allocating resources from a non-individualist and essentially bio-medical perspective, which interprets health (or disease) as a mere feature of the individual. On the contrary, starting from a planetary health approach (Potter) and an "ecosophical" view of human beings (Næss), individual health gains meaning in a broader context.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF