98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objective: Error in birthweight prediction by sonographic estimated fetal weight (EFW) has clinical implications, such as avoidable cesarean or misclassification of fetal risk in labor. We aimed to evaluate optimal timing of ultrasound and which fetal measurements contribute to error in fetal ultrasound estimations of birth size at the extremes of birthweight.
Study Design: We compared differences in head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), femur length, and EFW between ultrasound and corresponding birth measurements within 14 ( = 1,290) and 7 ( = 617) days of birth for small- (SGA, <10th percentile), appropriate- (AGA, 10th-90th), and large-for-gestational age (LGA, >90th) newborns.
Results: Average differences between EFW and birthweight for SGA neonates were: -40.2 g (confidence interval [CI]: -82.1, 1.6) at 14 days versus 13.6 g (CI: -52.4, 79.7) at 7 days; for AGA, -122.4 g (-139.6, -105.1) at 14 days versus -27.2 g (-50.4, -4.0) at 7 days; and for LGA, -242.8 g (-306.5, -179.1) at 14 days versus -72.1 g (-152.0, 7.9) at 7 days. Differences between fetal and neonatal HC were larger at 14 versus 7 days, and similar to patterns for EFW and birthweight, differences were the largest for LGA at both intervals. In contrast, differences between fetal and neonatal AC were larger at 7 versus 14 days, suggesting larger error in AC estimation closer to birth.
Conclusion: Using a standardized ultrasound protocol, SGA neonates had ultrasound measurements closer to actual birth measurements compared with AGA or LGA neonates. LGA neonates had the largest differences between fetal and neonatal size, with measurements 14 days from delivery showing 3- to 4-fold greater differences from birthweight. Differences in EFW and birthweight may not be explained by a single fetal measurement; whether estimation may be improved by incorporation of other knowable factors should be evaluated in future research.
Key Points: · Ultrasound measurements may be inadequate to predict neonatal size at birth.. · Birthweight estimation error is higher for neonates >90th percentile.. · There is higher error in AC closer to birth..
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11496022 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2298-5245 | DOI Listing |
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
September 2025
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Objective: Fetal growth standards determine which fetuses are diagnosed with fetal growth restriction (FGR) and become candidates for enhanced fetal monitoring. Given the existence of race-based differences in fetal and neonatal weights, we sought to determine the impact of race-based customization of fetal growth curves on the antenatal detection of FGR.
Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of 8731 individuals who identified as either White or Black and delivered a liveborn singleton at Magee-Womens Hospital (MWH), Pittsburgh, PA, USA, between January 2003 and January 2013, with at least one sonographic measurement of estimated fetal weight (EFW) taken at 23-41 weeks' gestation.
Sci Rep
August 2025
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Toho University Omori Medical Center, 6-11-1, Omorinishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 143-8540, Japan.
Given the decline in birthweights over the past 30 years in Japan and advancements in ultrasound technology, this study aimed to establish new reference values for ultrasound fetal biometry in Japan and to compare them with international and Asian studies. We conducted a cross-sectional prospective study involving singleton pregnancies who received prenatal checkups at obstetric facilities across Japan. During routine prenatal care, ultrasound measurements-biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), and femur length (FL)-were recorded.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUltraschall Med
August 2025
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
The main goal of fetal growth monitoring is to identify fetuses at increased risk of morbidity and mortality. This study compares 5 commonly used growth charts (Hadlock, FMF, NICHD, INTERGROWTH-21, WHO) to assess their ability to identify pregnancies below the 10 percentile and predict adverse neonatal outcomes.We retrospectively analyzed 572 singleton pregnancies with an estimated fetal weight (EFW) <10 percentile according to Hadlock, excluding multiple pregnancies or cases with maternal comorbidities.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Ultrasound Med
August 2025
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado Health Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Objectives: The umbilical vein (UV) plays a crucial role in fetal oxygenation, and its dysfunction may contribute to adverse outcomes in small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses. We hypothesized that UV Doppler assessment could enhance risk stratification and guide delivery timing. This study compared UV hemodynamics between SGA and appropriately-for-gestational-age (AGA) fetuses to evaluate their predictive value for low birth weight.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Perinatol
August 2025
Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Branch, Division of Population Health Research, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
This study aimed to examine whether the addition of fetal growth velocities, based on serial scans, compared with estimated fetal weight (EFW) alone, improves the prediction accuracy of birth weight (BW).From the prospective National Institute for Child Health and Human Development Fetal Growth Studies, Singletons (2009-2013) that recruited women at low-risk for aberrant fetal growth, we included 2,397 participants with two to five ultrasounds between 15 and 41 weeks. Fetal growth velocity () was calculated between successive visits.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF