Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: The federal 340B Drug Pricing Program allows eligible hospitals, including critical access hospitals (CAHs), to obtain outpatient drugs at a discounted rate. CAHs likely benefit from 340B participation because they are often under-resourced and serve at-risk patient populations. The objective of this study was to understand predictors of 340B program participation among CAHs, and how participation varies with community-level social vulnerability.

Methods: We used a cross-sectional study design to assess the relationship between 340B participation in 2019 and community vulnerability status using 2018 data from the CDC's social vulnerability index (SVI) among acute care CAHs. Analyses used linear probability models adjusted for hospital-level characteristics.

Findings: In bivariate analyses, CAHs participating in the 340B program had lower overall social vulnerability scores, relative to nonparticipating, eligible, and ineligible CAHs, respectively (43.8 vs. 48.7 vs. 64.7, p < 0.10). In adjusted regression models, greater community vulnerability rankings due to socioeconomic status (-0.129, p < 0.05) and minority status and language (-0.092, p < 0.05) were associated with decreased 340B participation. Higher hospital operating margin was associated with increased 340B participation (0.163, p < 0.05). Although the number of for-profit CAHs ineligible for 340B was small, they had the highest community-level social vulnerability score and lowest hospital operating margin on average.

Conclusions: CAHs located in areas of high community vulnerability are less likely to participate in the 340B program. Some vulnerable patient populations served by CAHs may be excluded from 340B program benefits.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12833DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

340b participation
20
social vulnerability
16
340b program
16
340b
12
community vulnerability
12
cahs
9
340b drug
8
drug pricing
8
pricing program
8
predictors 340b
8

Similar Publications

Background: Since 2020, US drug manufacturers have restricted the use of the 340B Drug Pricing Program, leading to unexpected increases in medication costs for individuals with type 2 diabetes engaged in care in community health centers.

Objective: To explore experiences of individuals with diabetes regarding medication access in the era of 340B Drug Pricing Program restrictions.

Design: Qualitative study using direct content analysis grounded in Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Implementing HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in the U.S. is critical to decreasing HIV transmission.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The incentive to treat: Physician agency and the expansion of the 340B drug pricing program.

J Health Econ

May 2025

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Center for Translational and Policy Research on Precision Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, United States. Electronic address:

The 340B Drug Pricing Program incentivizes healthcare providers to increase medication use. It does this by allowing certain safety-net hospitals and clinics to purchase outpatient drugs at considerable discounts from manufacturers but be reimbursed at full price by payers. Yet, previous literature has left largely unstudied how the 340B program influences physician prescribing behavior.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The 340B Drug Pricing Program has been controversial since its inception in 1992, a major criticism being that 340B hospitals use more outpatient drugs, and more expensive drugs, because of financial incentives to "make money" through the program. The goal of this study was to determine whether characteristics of patients treated at 340B hospitals, and affiliation of hospitals with NCI-designated cancer centers, would explain higher Part B drug costs and use of more expensive chemotherapy drugs.

Methods: This is an observational study using data from SEER-Medicare and 340B entity database.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Recent court ruling could increase the size and administrative complexity of the 340B program.

Health Aff Sch

December 2024

Department of Economics and Brooks School of Public Policy, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, United States.

The 340B program allows certain hospitals and clinics to use outpatient drugs purchased at substantial discounts on insured patients, generating profits to fund care. The size of these profits depends on the number of prescriptions filled by participating hospital or clinics' insured patients that also meet the Health Resources and Services Agency's definition of an eligible patient. A recent court case has challenged the Agency's longstanding definition of a patient, resulting in new definition that could significantly expand the size of the program and create conflicts when an insured patient satisfies the new definition for more than one hospital or clinic participating in the program.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF