Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Judicial improvement and trade structure optimization are important elements in achieving a high level of openness. This paper develops a theoretical framework on the impact of local protectionism on market integration and export technical complexity, and then empirically analyses the effect of judicial improvement on the technical complexity of urban product exports and its mechanism of action based on a quasi-natural experiment with the establishment of circuit courts. The study finds that the establishment of circuit courts significantly increases the technical complexity of product exports, and the findings remain valid after a series of robustness tests. Further analysis shows that the technology enhancement effect of the establishment of circuit courts is more pronounced in the group of cities with higher administrative levels, better location advantages, and less advanced rule of law. Mechanism Analysis shows that a superior institutional environment can have a two-sided effect on different types of firms. Overall, however, the productivity-enhancing effect of low-productivity firms exiting the market is lower than the productivity-reducing effect of higher-productivity firms' increased compliance costs, which in turn weakens the positive promotional effect of circuit courts. The above theoretical and empirical findings provide policy implications for maximizing the technology enhancement effect of the establishment of circuit courts on product exports, thereby promoting a high level of openness in China.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10942076PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0296442PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

circuit courts
24
establishment circuit
16
judicial improvement
12
technical complexity
12
product exports
12
market integration
8
integration export
8
export technical
8
high level
8
level openness
8

Similar Publications

Noneconomic damage caps are controversial because they seek to balance uncertain benefits through reductions in physician precautionary costs, against uncertain harms to patient welfare. Opposing policy actions at the state-level reflect this controversy as some states have enacted noneconomic damage caps over the past few decades while others repealed their caps. Our difference-in-differences analyses suggest that repeals increase premiums.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The Family DOORS Triage Tool is a self-report measure of family violence victimization and perpetration risk, completed by parties on filing or responding to a parenting matter in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Divisions 1 and 2), collectively "the Courts." The tool and associated risk rubric inform subsequent risk response processes within the Courts. We sought to test the tool's utility and fitness-for-purpose within a new family violence response initiative by the Courts.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A "Bare Hope of A Result": The Second CRISPR Patent Appeal.

CRISPR J

July 2025

College of Law, Carle Illinois College of Medicine, European Union Center, Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, USA.

On May 12, 2025, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its second decision in the long-running CRISPR patent dispute between the Regents of the University of California and related institutions (CVC) and the Broad Institute. This Perspective recounts the principal dispute to date, reviews the Federal Circuit's recent opinion, and provides a critique of its analysis. In particular, this Perspective highlights how the decision is self-contradictory and in tension with patent law's conception doctrine-when an inventor has formed a "definite and permanent" idea of an invention in the mind or whether the invention was little more than a "bare hope" of a result.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Behavior choices amongst grooming, feeding, and courting in show contextual flexibility, not an absolute hierarchy of needs.

bioRxiv

May 2025

Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, United States of America.

To determine the algorithmic rules and neural circuits controlling selection amongst competing behaviors, we established assays where adult choose between grooming and feeding, grooming and courting, or feeding and courting. We find that there is not an absolute hierarchy: while flies typically perform grooming first, they can choose to feed if sufficiently starved, or court if an appropriate female is available. Flies alternate between competing behaviors, performing short bouts of each action rather than completely satisfying one drive before transitioning to another.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This commentary analyzes the recent attacks on adolescents' access to contraception by religious and parental rights activists and the conservative legal movement. Specifically, we focus on , a 2024 case in which the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals held that a Texas state law requiring parental consent for minors to access contraception is not preempted by a longstanding policy under Title X of the federal Public Health Service Act that prohibits clinics receiving federal funding from requiring parental consent or notification. We first describe existing laws governing minors' confidential access to reproductive health care, including the federal constitutional framework for parental rights, state parental notification and consent laws, and Title X, the federal law that provides federal funds to reproductive health care clinics for low-income people.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF