Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the reliability and validity of the WHODAS 2.0 instrument for women with urinary incontinence (UI).

Methods: This is a methodological study with Brazilian women with complaints of urge, stress or mixed UI, over 18 years old, without cognitive disorders. The WHODAS 2.0 (36-item version) and the auxiliary instruments were applied through face-to-face and telephone interviews after 7-14 d. The psychometric properties evaluated were: Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for intra-rater test-retest, Spearman's correlation coefficient (rho) for construct validity of WHODAS 2.0 with auxiliary instruments; and ANOVA for discriminative validity with UI severity.

Results: 101 women with UI with a mean age of 50.71 ± 10.39 were included. WHODAS 2.0 showed good reliability in all domains and excellent reliability in the total score (>0.80). The intra-evaluator test-retest showed ICC values between 0.59 and 0.87 ( < 0.001). We observed a positive correlation between the WHODAS 2.0 domains and the instruments recommended by International Continence Society (ICS), with greater emphasis on moderate correlation with the Urinary Impact Questionnaire (IUQ-7) subscale (rho = 0.730  < 0.001).

Conclusion: The WHODAS 2.0 instrument is a reliable and valid questionnaire for investigating the functioning and disability of women with UI.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2327479DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

reliability validity
8
women urinary
8
urinary incontinence
8
validity whodas
8
auxiliary instruments
8
correlation coefficient
8
whodas
5
reliability
4
validity brazilian
4
brazilian version
4

Similar Publications

Accurate determination of the parameters of each high purity germanium, HPGe detectors ensure the precision of quantitative results obtained from spectrum analysis. This study presents a comprehensive performance evaluation and long-term quality control assessment of a high-purity germanium (HPGe) gamma spectrometry system that has been operational for over 15 years. Key spectrometric measures were recorded, including energy resolution, peak shape ratios, asymmetry, peak-to-Compton ratio, relative efficiency, electronic noise, minimum detectable activity (MDA), and repeatability and reproducibility of the system.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Evaluation of the accuracy of ChatGPT in answering asthma-related questions.

J Bras Pneumol

September 2025

. Divisão de Pneumologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo (SP) Brasil.

Objective: To evaluate the quality of ChatGPT answers to asthma-related questions, as assessed from the perspectives of asthma specialists and laypersons.

Methods: Seven asthma-related questions were asked to ChatGPT (version 4) between May 3, 2024 and May 4, 2024. The questions were standardized with no memory of previous conversations to avoid bias.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted colonoscopy has emerged as a tool to enhance adenoma detection rates (ADRs) and improve lesion characterization. However, its performance in real-world settings, especially in developing countries, remains uncertain.

Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of AI on ADRs and its concordance with histopathological diagnosis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: This study aimed to translate the Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Score into Brazilian Portuguese, adapting it culturally and validating it semantically.

Methods: The process followed international guidelines for translation, back-translation, cultural adaptation, and semantic validation, involving a committee of specialists and a pre-test with 10 Brazilian pediatric patients with neurogenic bowel dysfunction (mean age: 11 years). Participants were divided into two groups, depending on whether they used transanal irrigation for intestinal management.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Accurate evaluation of the invasion depth of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SESCC) is crucial for optimal treatment. While magnifying endoscopy (ME) using the Japanese Esophageal Society (JES) classification is reported as the most accurate method to predict invasion depth, its efficacy has not been tested in the Western world. This study aims to evaluate the interobserver agreement of the JES classification for SESCC and its accuracy in estimating invasion depth in a Brazilian tertiary hospital.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF