A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Screening for Synergistic Reagents With Pazopanib Against Osteosarcoma Using a Compound Library. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background/aim: Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common malignant bone tumor. As the same agents have been in use since the mid-1970s, new therapeutic approaches are needed to improve prognosis. Pazopanib (PZP) has already demonstrated marked antitumor activity clinically and can be effective in patients with metastatic OS. We investigated the combination treatment of candidate agents with PZP and examined effects on tumor growth using an in vivo model.

Materials And Methods: A library of 324 compounds was used. MG63 OS cells were treated with PZP and each compound. Cell viability was measured. The antiproliferative effects of compound combination on four OS cell lines was tested. Cell signaling was evaluated by western blot analysis. In vivo antitumor testing was performed using 143B-bearing mice.

Results: The screening process identified crizotinib (CRZ) as the most effective drug for combination with PZP. The combination of PZP and CRZ demonstrated effects compared to control or single therapy. Cell signal investigation showed that dual therapy down-regulated c-MYC, p-AKT, p-STAT3, p-cyclin D1 and survivin and up-regulated cleaved caspase-3 and cleaved PARP compared to control or single therapy. In vivo analysis showed dual therapy achieved synergic effects for tumor growth compared to control or single-treatment groups. No significant difference in the change in body weight was observed among groups.

Conclusion: Combined use of PZP and CRZ offers synergic anti-tumor effects against OS, inducing apoptosis in vitro and in vivo by down-regulating AKT and STAT3. Our data suggest that these agents can be used for patients clinically.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.16902DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

compared control
12
effects tumor
8
tumor growth
8
combination pzp
8
pzp crz
8
control single
8
single therapy
8
dual therapy
8
pzp
6
effects
5

Similar Publications