Single-Chamber and Dual-Chamber Pacemaker Devices in Adults with Moderate and Complex Congenital Heart Disease: A Single Tertiary Referral Center Experience.

The number of device implantation procedures has increased in adult patients with congenital heart disease (ACHD). Despite significant improvements in materials and implantation techniques, these patients are exposed to higher risk of device related complications than general population. Herein, we describe our single tertiary referral center experience on transvenous pacemaker (PM) implantation and follow-up in adult patients with moderate and complex congenital heart disease (CHD) as limited data are available on long-term outcome. We considered all adults with moderate and complex CHD aged more than 16 years who underwent transvenous single-chamber and dual-chamber PM implant for sinus node dysfunction or atrioventricular block between January 2013 to December 2022 at our Unit. Seventy-one ACHD patients were included in the study (mean age 38.6 ± 15.2 years, 64% with moderate CHD, 36% with complex CHD). Among 32 patients implanted with a dual chamber PM (DDD PM), 4 devices were reprogrammed in VDD mode, 3 in VVI and 2 in AAI mode during follow-up because of lead dysfunction or permanent atrial arrhythmia. In addition, 26 patients had a single chamber PM (AAI or VVI PM) and 13 patients had single-lead pacing system with a free-floating atrial electrode pair (VDD PM). Just one of 13 single-lead VDD PM was reprogrammed in VVI mode due to a low atrial sensing. In DDD PM group, 10 re-interventions were needed due to lead dysfunction (8 cases) and lead-related infective endocarditis (2 cases). Only 3 patients in the single-lead PM group developed lead dysfunction with 2 re-interventions needed, but no infective endocarditis was reported. The rate of long-term complications is high in moderate and complex ACHD with transvenous PM devices, and it is mainly lead-related. In our experience, the less leads implanted, the less complications will occur. Considering the heterogeneity of the ACHD population, transvenous single-chamber or dual-chamber PM device implantation should always be tailored on the single patient, balancing risks and benefits in this complex population.