Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Since the onset of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic in Belgium, UZ/KU Leuven has played a crucial role as the National Reference Centre (NRC) for respiratory pathogens, to be the first Belgian laboratory to develop and implement laboratory developed diagnostic assays for SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) and later to assess the quality of commercial kits. To meet the growing demand for decentralised testing, both clinical laboratories and government-supported high-throughput platforms were gradually deployed across Belgium. Consequently, the role of the NRC transitioned from a specialised testing laboratory to strengthening capacity and coordinating quality assurance. Here, we outline the measures taken by the NRC, the national public health institute Sciensano and the executing clinical laboratories to ensure effective quality management of molecular testing throughout the initial two years of the pandemic (March 2020 to March 2022).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10858549PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12985-024-02308-yDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

quality assurance
8
molecular testing
8
national reference
8
reference centre
8
clinical laboratories
8
nationwide quality
4
assurance high-throughput
4
high-throughput diagnostic
4
diagnostic molecular
4
testing
4

Similar Publications

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) management was largely centered around renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) optimization, until recent emergence of novel therapeutics. However, slow adoption of guideline-directed therapy leaves patients vulnerable to disease progression. In 2022, a data-driven informatics approach was introduced to track real-time adherence to best practices.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use M10 guideline provides a global framework for bioanalytical method validation in studies intended for regulatory submission. While its structure ensures consistency and data reliability, the guideline also acknowledges that not all studies require the same level of validation. This paper examines where full compliance is essential and where scientific judgment allows for leaner, context-driven validation, such as in early-stage development, for additional matrices, metabolites, nonstandard biological matrices or studies intended for internal decision-making.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence of psychiatric symptoms in prehospital emergency care and the characteristics of this patient group as well as the association with deprivation in the district, self-assessment of health status, and the frequency of emergency calls due to or accompanied by psychiatric diagnoses.

Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study descriptively and analytically evaluated all ground-based Emergency Medical Service and rescue service incidents dispatched by the Integrated Regional Control Center (IRLS) in the period from January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021. In addition to the clinical parameters and the demographic data of the patients, the sociodemographic characteristics of the incident location at the district level, unemployment rate, net equivalent household income, and the proportion of single-person households, as well as personal assessment of mental health and overall well-being, were included in the study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background/aims: While the clinical effectiveness of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is well established in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), its specific impact on cause-specific mortality remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the impact of GDMT on both cardiac and non-cardiac mortality in AMI patients.

Methods: Data of the KAMIR-NIH, a multicenter prospective registry of AMI in Korea between 2011 and 2015, were included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Professional and specialty nursing organizations (SNOs) develop position statements to offer practice guidance, amplify the views of nursing, educate consumers and decision makers, and encourage research. The Westberg Institute Research Committee, with representatives from other faith community nursing specialty organizations, has answered frequently asked practice questions by developing position statements using a rigorous process of statement development underpinned by topic exploration and synthesis of existing research and utilizing surveys to assess current practice. The processes for creating a position statement, Faith Community Nursing's Response to Inclusion, Diversity and Cultural Sensitivity, and revising Faith Community Nursing: Hands-On, Direct Care, and Specialized Care are presented.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF