98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Laparoscopic colectomy is widely accepted as a safe operation for colorectal cancer, but we have experienced resistance to the introduction of the FreeHand robotic camera holder to augment laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Aim: To compare the initial results between conventional and FreeHand robot-assisted laparoscopic colectomy in Trinidad and Tobago.
Methods: This was a prospective study of outcomes from all laparoscopic colectomies performed for colorectal carcinoma from November 29, 2021 to May 30, 2022. The following data were recorded: Operating time, conversions, estimated blood loss, hospitalization, morbidity, surgical resection margins and number of nodes harvested. All data were entered into an excel database and the data were analyzed using SPSS ver 20.0.
Results: There were 23 patients undergoing colectomies for malignant disease: 8 (35%) FreeHand-assisted and 15 (65%) conventional laparoscopic colectomies. There were no conversions. Operating time was significantly lower in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic colectomy (95.13 ± 9.22 105.67 ± 11.48 min; = 0.045). Otherwise, there was no difference in estimated blood loss, nodal harvest, hospitalization, morbidity or mortality.
Conclusion: The FreeHand robot for colectomies is safe, provides some advantages over conventional laparoscopy and does not compromise oncologic standards in the resource-poor Caribbean setting.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10841952 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v12.i3.488 | DOI Listing |
JSLS
September 2025
Department of Surgery, Samsung Kangbuk Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University of School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. (Drs. Kang, Lee, Kim, Kim, and Jung).
Background And Objectives: The safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic approaches for emergency colorectal surgery are not yet fully established, though their use is increasing with studies reporting laparoscopic colectomy is safe and feasible for appropriately selected patients. Hand-assisted laparoscopy (HAL) involves inserting one hand into the abdomen through a small incision, offering advantages that may facilitate laparoscopic procedures in emergencies. This study reports our experience with emergency HAL colectomy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJSLS
September 2025
Colorectal and Minimally Invasive Surgery Specialists, Jackson Medical Group, Jackson S. Medical Center, Miami, Florida, USA. (Drs. Altamirano, Adogowa, and Lujan).
Background: Management of left-sided colorectal Grade C anastomotic leak (AL) has traditionally been managed via laparotomy. However, with the growing adoption of minimally invasive techniques, recent literature suggests that laparoscopic surgery provides a safe and viable alternative for managing Grade C leaks.
Methods: This study is a case series that consists of 7 adults that underwent laparoscopic reintervention of purulent or feculent peritonitis from left-sided colorectal AL during the period of 2016-2024 at our institution.
Surgery
September 2025
Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI; Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Background: Although procedure-specific guidelines have been established for postoperative opioid prescribing in the elective setting, it is unknown to what extent prescriptions in the emergency setting adhere to these standards. Variation in opioid prescribing for emergency general surgery patients may represent context-appropriate deviation or an opportunity for improved stewardship.
Methods: Leveraging data from a statewide Acute Care Surgery collaborative, we identified patients undergoing 4 common procedures in the emergency setting: laparoscopic appendectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, emergency hernia repair, and open colectomy.
J Gastrointest Surg
September 2025
Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA. Electronic address:
Background: Obesity is associated with increased risk of conversion to open surgery, which in turn is associated with worse postoperative outcomes. We hypothesize that, with its improved ergonomics and instrument dexterity, the robotic approach to right colectomy will be associated with a decreased risk of conversion to open compared to laparoscopic right colectomy.
Methods: Obese adults (BMI ≥30kg/m) undergoing elective laparoscopic (LRC) or robotic (RRC) right colectomy for colon adenocarcinoma (2015-2022) were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and its colectomy-targeted participant use file.
Laparoscopic resection has become the standard surgical technique in treating colorectal cancer. This approach has many advantages over open surgery such as: faster recovery, lower postoperative pain with reduced postoperative pain scores and opioid requirements and shorter hospital-stay. Improving postoperative pain management by performing transversus abdominis plane block enhances some of the benefits of laparoscopic colorecat surgery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF