Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: To ascertain the working patterns of the NHS orthodontic workforce in Wales and any possible future changes.

Design: Descriptive cross-sectional survey.

Participants: NHS orthodontic practitioners in Wales.

Methods: An anonymised email distributed an electronic two-part survey of the Welsh NHS orthodontic workforce. The survey consisted of three sections: (1) demographic information; (2) respondents' working pattern (part 1); and (3) perceptions of professional satisfaction (part 2).

Results: Part 1 of the survey yielded a 70.5% response rate (n = 79); 65.8% of the respondents were women. Of the respondents, 45.6% (n = 36) worked full time (F/T), 39.2% (n = 31) worked less than F/T and 15.2% (n = 12) worked more than F/T. Of the male respondents, 81.5% (n = 22) worked 10 sessions or more compared to 50% (n = 26) of women. The respondents undertook 508.5 orthodontic clinical sessions per week within Wales; of these sessions, 87.6% (n = 445.5) delivered NHS orthodontic care. Of the respondents, 8.4% (n = 7) were planning to increase their orthodontic clinical time within the next 2 years, 24.1% (n = 19) were planning to decrease it and 20.3% (n = 16) were unsure. One-quarter of respondents indicated that they were planning to stop clinical orthodontic activity within the next 5 years, including 53.3% (n = 8) of DwSIs, 37% (n = 10) of primary care specialists and 13.3% (n = 2) of consultants. The pandemic was an influencing factor for 80% of these clinicians.

Conclusions: Part 1 of the survey suggested that the majority of the orthodontic workforce was female, were working full time or more, and spent most sessions delivering NHS care. One-quarter of respondents were planning to cease undertaking orthodontic activity within the next 5 years.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14653125231224459DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nhs orthodontic
20
orthodontic workforce
12
orthodontic
10
orthodontic practitioners
8
working patterns
8
women respondents
8
full time
8
worked f/t
8
orthodontic clinical
8
one-quarter respondents
8

Similar Publications

Objective: To test the validity and reliability of The Spacing Index (TSI).

Design: A single-centre diagnostic study.

Setting: Orthodontic Department, Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UKMethods:TSI was outlined based on the principle of mild spacing (0-4 mm), moderate spacing (5-8 mm) and severe spacing (>8 mm).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Can magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reduce lingual nerve injuries during mandibular third molar surgery? A scoping review.

BMC Oral Health

July 2025

Institute of Dentistry, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill Campus, Cornhill Road, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZR, UK.

Background: Recent advancements in MRI, with its superior soft tissue resolution and ionising radiation-free nature, provide a promising solution for the limitations of current imaging modalities. This review aims to evaluate whether MRI can be utilised to reduce the risk of lingual nerve (LN) injury during mandibular third molar surgery (M3M).

Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, the protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024625994).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Waiting lists for NHS orthodontic care in England: how long are children waiting?

Br Dent J

July 2025

Countess of Chester Hospital, Orthodontic Department, Liverpool Road, Chester, CH2 1UL, UK; Alder Hey Children´s Hospital, Orthodontic Department, E Prescot Road, Liverpool, L14 5AB, UK.

Background The provision of timely orthodontic care under the NHS (National Health Service) in England is critical. However, increasing waiting times for orthodontic assessments have raised concerns about equitable access and potential negative impacts on oral health outcomes.Objective This audit investigates current waiting times for NHS orthodontic assessments across England, highlighting regional disparities and compliance with established care standards.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Reporting and interpretation of subgroup analyses in orthodontic meta-analysis; a meta-epidemiological study.

Eur J Orthod

June 2025

Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, School of Dentistry, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 7, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.

Background/objectives: In systematic reviews (SRs) with a meta-analysis, a subgroup analysis can be utilised to explore heterogeneity of treatment effects across patient characteristics and assess how patient characteristics, types of intervention, or trial characteristics modify the treatment effect. The aim of this meta-epidemiological study was to investigate the reporting and interpretation of subgroup analyses in the orthodontic literature.

Methodology: SRs published between 1st January 2017 - 30th June 2024 in five orthodontic journals and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) were hand searched from journal websites.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The attractiveness of a person's smile is influenced by several factors, including gingival display, incisor show, and facial asymmetries. Malocclusion has long been recognized as having a significant negative impact on smile aesthetics. Addressing dentofacial deformities is a major treatment goal in orthodontic and orthognathic interventions, aiming to improve both functional and aesthetic outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF