Pericardial Effusion Predicts Clinical Outcomes in Patients with COVID-19: A Nationwide Multicenter Study.

Acad Radiol

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany (B.M., A.S.); Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology and Nuclear Medicine, Johannes Wesling University Hospital, Ruhr-University-Bochum, Bochum, Germany (J.B., A.S.). Electronic address: alexey.suro

Published: May 2024


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Rationale And Objectives: The prognostic role of pericardial effusion (PE) in Covid 19 is unclear. The aim of the present study was to estimate the prognostic role of PE in patients with Covid 19 in a large multicentre setting.

Materials And Methods: This retrospective study is a part of the German multicenter project RACOON (Radiological Cooperative Network of the Covid 19 pandemic). The acquired sample comprises 1197 patients, 363 (30.3%) women and 834 (69.7%) men. In every case, chest computed tomography was analyzed for PE. Data about 30-day mortality, need for mechanical ventilation and need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission were collected. Data were evaluated by means of descriptive statistics. Group differences were calculated with Mann-Whitney test and Fisher exact test. Uni-and multivariable regression analyses were performed.

Results: Overall, 46.4% of the patients were admitted to ICU, mechanical lung ventilation was performed in 26.6% and 30-day mortality was 24%. PE was identified in 159 patients (13.3%). The presence of PE was associated with 30-day mortality: HR= 1.54, CI 95% (1.05; 2.23), p = 0.02 (univariable analysis), and HR= 1.60, CI 95% (1.03; 2.48), p = 0.03 (multivariable analysis). Furthermore, density of PE was associated with the need for intubation (OR=1.02, CI 95% (1.003; 1.05), p = 0.03) and the need for ICU admission (OR=1.03, CI 95% (1.005; 1.05), p = 0.01) in univariable regression analysis. The presence of PE was associated with 30-day mortality in male patients, HR= 1.56, CI 95%(1.01-2.43), p = 0.04 (multivariable analysis). In female patients, none of PE values predicted clinical outcomes.

Conclusion: The prevalence of PE in Covid 19 is 13.3%. PE is an independent predictor of 30-day mortality in male patients with Covid 19. In female patients, PE plays no predictive role.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2023.12.003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

30-day mortality
20
patients
9
pericardial effusion
8
prognostic role
8
patients covid
8
presence associated
8
associated 30-day
8
multivariable analysis
8
mortality male
8
male patients
8

Similar Publications

This study aims to optimize the dynamic administration regimen of prophylactic enoxaparin in critically ill patients to reduce the risk of VTE, major bleeding, and 30-day all-cause mortality. We developed and internally and externally validated an artificial intelligence (AI) policy utilizing Double dueling deep Q network, using data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database (training and internal test set) and the eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD, external test set). We compared the performance among the AI policy, the clinician's policy, the weight-tiered policy, and the fixed 40- mg-once-daily (QD) policy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cardiac Biomarkers and Risk Stratification in Liver Transplantation for Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure: Refining Current Risk Models for Improved Prediction of Post-transplant Mortality.

Anesthesiology

September 2025

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Laboratory for Cardiovascular Dynamics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Republic of Korea.

Background: Cardiovascular complications are the leading cause of mortality following liver transplantation (LT) in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). However, the extent of cardiac impairment in these patients remains unclear. Current risk models, including the CLIF-C-organ failure (CLIF-C-OF), NACSELD-ACLF, and the novel Sundaram ACLF-LT-mortality (SALT-M) scores primarily focus on blood pressure and the use of cardiovascular drugs, without directly assessing biomarkers of cardiac injury.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Causes of Death After Surgery Among Cancer Patients: A Population-based Cohort Study.

Int J Surg

September 2025

State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.

Introduction: Recent advancements in surgical techniques and perioperative care have improved cancer survival rates, yet postoperative comorbidity and mortality remain a critical concern. Despite progress in cancer control, systematic analyses of long-term mortality trends and competing risks in surgery-intervened cancer populations are lacking. This study aimed to quantify temporal patterns of postoperative mortality causes across 21 solid cancers and identify dominant non-cancer risk factors to inform survivorship care strategies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The study aimed to compare the impact of combination and monotherapy on mortality, antibiotic consumption using 'Days of Therapy (DOT)', and antibiotic-related adverse events in patients with methicillin-susceptible (MSSA) bacteraemia.

Methods: This retrospective study included all adult patients (>18 years) with MSSA bacteraemia who received either monotherapy (beta-lactam alone) or combination therapy (beta-lactam plus teicoplanin or daptomycin or linezolid) between 2018 and 2023. Mortality, antibiotic consumption, and factors predicting mortality were analysed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: Cardiogenic shock remains a significant cause of mortality despite multiple advancements in medical interventions. Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) provides crucial circulatory support but also increases left ventricular (LV) after-load, potentially worsening outcomes. Effective LV unloading strategies can enhance patient survival during VA-ECMO treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF