Response to Individualized vs. conventional ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a multicenter, randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded, phase 3 noninferiority trial.

Salvatore Longobardi , Thomas M D'Hooghe

Fertil Steril

Global Medical Affairs Fertility, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany; Department of Development and Regeneration, Laboratory of Endometrium, Endometriosis and Reproductive Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University Medical Schoo

Published: April 2024

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

Download full-text PDF
Source

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.024 DOI Listing

Download full-text PDF	Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.024	DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

response individualized

individualized conventional

conventional ovarian

ovarian stimulation

stimulation in vitro

in vitro fertilization

fertilization multicenter

multicenter randomized

randomized controlled

controlled assessor-blinded

A PHP Error was encountered